Second-look arthroscopy after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon graft

被引:10
|
作者
Mae, Tatsuo [1 ]
Shino, Konsei [2 ]
Nakagawa, Shigeto [2 ]
Take, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Hiramatsu, Kunihiko [2 ]
Yoshikawa, Hideki [1 ]
Nakata, Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orhtopaed Surg, 2-2 Yamada Oka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Yukioka Hosp, Ctr Sports Orhtopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
关键词
BUNDLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the morphological and clinical outcomes between anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft and anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon (HST) grafts. Methods: The anatomic ACL reconstructions were performed on 467 patients; 233 patients with ART technique and 234 with ATB procedure. ART procedure was predominantly indicated for athletes with higher motivation to return to sports and aggressiveness for muscle training. A total of 113 patients, with a mean age of 20.7 years, had consented to undergo second-look arthroscopy. The average time from ACL reconstruction to the second-look was 10.0 months. This study included 56 ART techniques and 57 ATB procedures. The grafts underwent meticulous probing, and were evaluated based on tension, graft damage, and synovial coverage. Moreover, the femoral tunnel aperture was also observed in detail to assess the space between the femoral tunnel and the graft. As clinical evaluation, knee effusion, range of motion, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT side-to-side difference, and Lysholm score were assessed. Results: There was no significant difference in graft tension between two procedures, while HST graft in ATB procedure had more cases with graft damage (p = 0.05). Good synovial coverage was found in 98% in ART procedure and 70% in ATB procedure, showing a significant difference (P < 0.001). At femoral tunnel aperture, there were no cases with the space around BTB graft, while 33% showed the space around HST graft, again showing a significant difference (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: BTB graft with the ART procedure was superior to HST graft with the ATB procedure in morphology at second-look arthroscopy, while there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between two procedures. (c) 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rupture of the patellar tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft
    Weber, K
    Schmidgen, A
    Wentzensen, A
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (12): : 1124 - 1127
  • [22] An Arthroscopic Second-Look Study on the Effect of Remnant Preservation on Synovialization of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Guo, Lin
    Chen, Hao
    Luo, Jiang-ming
    Yang, Liu
    Gu, Ling-chuan
    Fu, De-jie
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (05): : 868 - 877
  • [23] Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    Struewer, Johannes
    Ziring, Ewgeni
    Oberkircher, Ludwig
    Schuettler, Karl F.
    Efe, Turgay
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (05) : 809 - 817
  • [24] Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    Johannes Struewer
    Ewgeni Ziring
    Ludwig Oberkircher
    Karl F. Schüttler
    Turgay Efe
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 809 - 817
  • [25] Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Pan X.
    Wen H.
    Wang L.
    Ge T.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013, 23 (7) : 819 - 823
  • [26] Radiographic assessment of bone tunnels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografting technique
    Hatipoglu, Mustafa Yasin
    Bircan, Resul
    Ozer, Hamza
    Selek, Hakan Yusuf
    Harput, Gulcan
    Baltac, Yasar Gul
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 32 (01): : 122 - 128
  • [27] Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis
    Biau, DJ
    Tournoux, C
    Katsahian, S
    Schranz, PJ
    Nizard, RS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7548): : 995 - 998
  • [28] A meta-analysis of hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Li, ShuZhen
    Su, Wei
    Zhao, Jinmin
    Xu, Yinglong
    Bo, Zhandong
    Ding, Xiaofei
    Wei, Qingjun
    KNEE, 2011, 18 (05): : 287 - 293
  • [29] Efficacy of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Graft into the Bone Defects after Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Higuchi, Hiroshi
    Kobayashi, Atsushi
    Ikeda, Keiko
    Hatayama, Kazuhisa
    Yanagisawa, Sinya
    Kato, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (05) : 467 - 473
  • [30] Tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts
    Murat Ali Hersekli
    Sercan Akpinar
    Metin Ozalay
    Gurkan Ozkoc
    Necip Cesur
    Mustafa Uysal
    Aysin Pourbagher
    Reha N. Tandogan
    Advances in Therapy, 2004, 21 : 123 - 131