Second-look arthroscopy after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon graft

被引:10
|
作者
Mae, Tatsuo [1 ]
Shino, Konsei [2 ]
Nakagawa, Shigeto [2 ]
Take, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Hiramatsu, Kunihiko [2 ]
Yoshikawa, Hideki [1 ]
Nakata, Ken [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orhtopaed Surg, 2-2 Yamada Oka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Yukioka Hosp, Ctr Sports Orhtopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
关键词
BUNDLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2018.10.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the morphological and clinical outcomes between anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft and anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon (HST) grafts. Methods: The anatomic ACL reconstructions were performed on 467 patients; 233 patients with ART technique and 234 with ATB procedure. ART procedure was predominantly indicated for athletes with higher motivation to return to sports and aggressiveness for muscle training. A total of 113 patients, with a mean age of 20.7 years, had consented to undergo second-look arthroscopy. The average time from ACL reconstruction to the second-look was 10.0 months. This study included 56 ART techniques and 57 ATB procedures. The grafts underwent meticulous probing, and were evaluated based on tension, graft damage, and synovial coverage. Moreover, the femoral tunnel aperture was also observed in detail to assess the space between the femoral tunnel and the graft. As clinical evaluation, knee effusion, range of motion, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT side-to-side difference, and Lysholm score were assessed. Results: There was no significant difference in graft tension between two procedures, while HST graft in ATB procedure had more cases with graft damage (p = 0.05). Good synovial coverage was found in 98% in ART procedure and 70% in ATB procedure, showing a significant difference (P < 0.001). At femoral tunnel aperture, there were no cases with the space around BTB graft, while 33% showed the space around HST graft, again showing a significant difference (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: BTB graft with the ART procedure was superior to HST graft with the ATB procedure in morphology at second-look arthroscopy, while there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between two procedures. (c) 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hamstring tendons or bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?
    Thaunat, Mathieu
    Fayard, Jean Marie
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (01) : S89 - S94
  • [2] Pain Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Keller, Robert A.
    Jung, Edward K.
    Khalil, Lafi
    Marshall, Nathan
    Kolowich, Patricia A.
    Moutzouros, Vasilios
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (12):
  • [3] A comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and bone-hamstring tendon-bone autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Matsumoto, A
    Yoshiya, S
    Muratsu, H
    Yagi, M
    Iwasaki, Y
    Kurosaka, M
    Kuroda, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (02): : 213 - 219
  • [4] Anterior Cruciate ligament reconstruction with a reharvested bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    O'Shea, JJ
    Shelbourne, KD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (02): : 208 - 213
  • [5] Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Versus Four Strands Hamstring Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Migliorini, F.
    Eschweiler, J.
    Tingart, M.
    Niewiera, M.
    Rath, B.
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (01): : 78 - 85
  • [6] Anatomic versus non-anatomic tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    Aglietti P.
    Zaccherotti G.
    Simeone A.J.V.
    Buzzi R.
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (Suppl 1) : S43 - S48
  • [7] Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system - Comparison of hamstring tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
    Tsuda, Eiichi
    Fukuda, Akira
    Tsukada, Harhiko
    Toh, Satoshi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (10): : 1903 - 1912
  • [8] Biomechanical characteristics of the anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft
    Mae, Tatsuo
    Shino, Konsei
    Iuchi, Ryo
    Kinugasa, Kazutaka
    Uchida, Ryohei
    Nakagawa, Shigeto
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Nakata, Ken
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (05) : 886 - 891
  • [9] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Versus Allograft
    Sun, Kang
    Tian, Shao-qi
    Zhang, Ji-hua
    Xia, Chang-suo
    Zhang, Cai-long
    Yu, Teng-bo
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (07): : 750 - 759
  • [10] The comparison of clinical efficacy of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone, autologous hamstring tendon and allogeneic bone-patellar tendon-bone
    Lu, Chao
    Huang, Xiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (08): : 12277 - 12284