Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Yonekura, Hiroshi [1 ]
Hirate, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sobue, Kazuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Mizuho Ku, 1 Kawasumi,Mizuho Cho, Nagoya, Aichi 4678602, Japan
关键词
Laparoscopy; Postoperative complications; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Prostatectomy; Robotic surgical procedures; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; TRENDELENBURG POSITION; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Limited data are available regarding the anesthetic management and outcome of patients undergoing pure laparoscopic radical prostarectomy (LRP) and robotic-assisted LRP (RALP). Therefore, our primary objective was to compare the anesthetic management between these 2 groups. Our secondary objective was to determine the incidence of adverse outcomes associated with RALP, which requires an extreme Trendelenburg position. Design: A retrospective observational study. Setting: University teaching hospital. Patients: A total of 223 men, consisting of 97 LRP patients and 126 RALP patients, treated during a 3-year period (January 2010-December 2012) were retrospectively studied. Interventions: None. Measurements: Information on patient demographics, type of anesthesia, anesthetic/pneumoperitoneum/ surgical times, intraoperative fluids and blood products, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, postoperative analgesic consumption, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative complications, and hospital stays was collected and compared. Main results: The estimated blood loss was higher in LRP patients than in RALP patients (median, 550 mL vs 200 mL; P < .001). Likewise, 24% of the LRP patients received intraoperative transfusions compared with 0.79% of the RALP patients (P < .001). The RALP patients had a longer anesthesia time (median, 276 vs 259 minutes; P = .032) and a greater intraoperative use of opioids (P < .001). The incidence of complications was similar in both groups with the exception of postoperative nausea and vomiting, which were observed more frequently among the RALP patients than among the LRP patients (33% vs 16%; P = .007). Conclusions: This is the first report to compare the anesthetic management of RALP vs LRP. Anesthesiologists can expect RALP surgery to be associated with less blood loss and a need for fewer blood products than traditional LRP surgery. The anesthetic outcome of RALP was generally satisfactory except for a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon retrospective study
    Lim, C. Y.
    Huang, S. K-H.
    Lee, K. H.
    Chiu, A. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 99 - 100
  • [32] Can Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improve Functional Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy? Experience at a Laparoscopic Center
    Lu, Cheng-Hsin
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Chen, Chung-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Lee, Yeh-Hsi
    Huang, Ching-Yu
    Yu, Tsan-Jung
    Lin, Victor C.
    [J]. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (03) : 124 - 130
  • [33] Pentafecta: A New Concept for Reporting Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Camacho, Ignacio
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Rocco, Bernardo
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (05) : 702 - 707
  • [34] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for large prostate
    Du, J.
    Ho, S. S. H.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 44 - 44
  • [35] THE EFFECT OF THE PRESENCE OF A MEDIAN LOBE ON THE OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Albo, Giancarlo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Acquati, Pietro
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananth
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1880 - 1880
  • [36] Comparisons of the Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Versus Pure Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Moulin, Morgan
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Claude-Clement
    Salomon, Laurent
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (03) : 610 - 619
  • [37] Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for a Single Experienced Surgeon: Comparison with Simultaneous Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Ha, Hong Koo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2015, 33 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [38] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the CGMH experience
    Pang, See-Tong
    Wu, Chun-Te
    Tsui, Ke-Hung
    Chang, Phei-Lang
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A229 - A230
  • [39] A NEW CONCEPT FOR REPORTING OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE OCTAFECTA
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Coelho, Rafael
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Patel, Vipul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E264 - E265
  • [40] Changes in pathologic outcomes and operative trends with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bernie, Aaron
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Ali, Adnan
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 30 (04) : 378 - 382