Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Yonekura, Hiroshi [1 ]
Hirate, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Sobue, Kazuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Mizuho Ku, 1 Kawasumi,Mizuho Cho, Nagoya, Aichi 4678602, Japan
关键词
Laparoscopy; Postoperative complications; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Prostatectomy; Robotic surgical procedures; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; TRENDELENBURG POSITION; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Limited data are available regarding the anesthetic management and outcome of patients undergoing pure laparoscopic radical prostarectomy (LRP) and robotic-assisted LRP (RALP). Therefore, our primary objective was to compare the anesthetic management between these 2 groups. Our secondary objective was to determine the incidence of adverse outcomes associated with RALP, which requires an extreme Trendelenburg position. Design: A retrospective observational study. Setting: University teaching hospital. Patients: A total of 223 men, consisting of 97 LRP patients and 126 RALP patients, treated during a 3-year period (January 2010-December 2012) were retrospectively studied. Interventions: None. Measurements: Information on patient demographics, type of anesthesia, anesthetic/pneumoperitoneum/ surgical times, intraoperative fluids and blood products, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, postoperative analgesic consumption, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative complications, and hospital stays was collected and compared. Main results: The estimated blood loss was higher in LRP patients than in RALP patients (median, 550 mL vs 200 mL; P < .001). Likewise, 24% of the LRP patients received intraoperative transfusions compared with 0.79% of the RALP patients (P < .001). The RALP patients had a longer anesthesia time (median, 276 vs 259 minutes; P = .032) and a greater intraoperative use of opioids (P < .001). The incidence of complications was similar in both groups with the exception of postoperative nausea and vomiting, which were observed more frequently among the RALP patients than among the LRP patients (33% vs 16%; P = .007). Conclusions: This is the first report to compare the anesthetic management of RALP vs LRP. Anesthesiologists can expect RALP surgery to be associated with less blood loss and a need for fewer blood products than traditional LRP surgery. The anesthetic outcome of RALP was generally satisfactory except for a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    D'Alonzo, Richard C.
    Gan, Tong J.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Albala, David M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Sun, Leon
    Dahm, Philipp
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2009, 21 (05) : 322 - 328
  • [2] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC VS ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Paciotti, Marco
    Nocera, Luigi
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Saitta, Cesare
    Piro, Adele
    Sarchi, Luca
    Contieri, Roberto
    Angelo, Mottaran
    Lores, Maria Peraire
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    De Groote, Ruben
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Casale, Paolo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1161 - E1161
  • [3] Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?
    Joseph, JV
    Vicente, I
    Madeb, R
    Erturk, E
    Patel, HRH
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [4] Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Rozet, Francois
    Harmon, Justin
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Barret, Eric
    Vallancien, Guy
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (02) : 171 - 179
  • [5] Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Francois Rozet
    Justin Harmon
    Xavier Cathelineau
    Eric Barret
    Guy Vallancien
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 171 - 179
  • [6] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [7] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Yu-Li Jiang
    Gao-Feng Zheng
    Ze-Peng Jiang
    Xie-Lai Zhen-Li
    Jin Zhou
    Chun-Hua Zhou
    Kang-Er Ye
    [J]. BMC Urology, 20
  • [9] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [10] Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes
    Willis, Daniel L.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    Brotzman, Michelle
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce
    Su, Li-Ming
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (06) : 898 - 905