The Prevalence of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Patients With Long Term Right Ventricular Pacing - Is it a Matter Of Definition?

被引:46
|
作者
Kaye, Gerald [1 ,2 ]
Ng, Jun Yen [1 ]
Ahmed, Shameer [1 ]
Valencia, Diana [1 ]
Harrop, Danielle [1 ]
Ng, Arnold C. T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Adv Imaging, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION | 2019年 / 28卷 / 07期
关键词
Right ventricular pacing; Cardiomyopathy; Pacing induced cardiomyopathy; Prevalence; GRADE ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; HEART-FAILURE; EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION; DUAL-CHAMBER; SITE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2018.05.196
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Chronic right ventricular pacing may contribute to deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing. Methods Patients attending a pacemaker clinic were retrospectively identified as having had transthoracic echocar-diographic LVEF measurement during the 12 months prior to device implantation. Those with card cardioverter-defibrillators or biventricular devices were excluded. The remaining patients were invited back for a repeat echocardiogram. Three (3) different definitions of PICM were employed: 1) follow-up LVEF of <= 40% if baseline LVEF was >= 50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF >= 5% if baseline LVEF was <50%; 2) follow-up LVEF of <= 40% if baseline LVEF was >= 50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF >= 10% if baseline LVEF was <= 50%; 3) absolute reduction in LVEF >= 10% irrespective of baseline LVEF. Alternate causes of cardiomyopathy were excluded following a chart review. Results The study cohort of 118 included 67 males (mean age 77.8 +/- 10.5 years) and 51 females (mean age 76.8 +/- 11.2 years). The mean time between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms was 3.5 + 1.4 years (range 1.5-6.4 years). The prevalence of PICM ranged from 5.9 to 39.0% depending on PICM definition. Multivariate analysis found that PICM was significantly associated with ventricular pacing burden (p = 0.013). Conclusions The prevalence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy is dependent on current accepted clinical definitions. A clear definition of PICM is required for a better understanding of the clinical implications of right ventricular pacing.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1033
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INCIDENCE OF STROKE IN PATIENTS WITH LONG TERM RIGHT VENTRICULAR PACING
    Prasad, Sendil Kumar Hari
    Kondareddy, Sreekanth
    Venkatesh, Govindarajan
    Stapleton, Dwight
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A346 - A346
  • [42] Cellular hypertrophy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
    Zafeiridis, A
    Dipla, K
    Filate, W
    Houser, SR
    Margulies, KB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 243A - 244A
  • [43] Prognostic factors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
    Zhang Hong
    Zhou Yu-Jie
    Zeng Yu-Jie
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2020, 133 (13) : 1533 - 1539
  • [44] Prognostic factors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhou, Yu-Jie
    Zeng, Yu-Jie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 133 (13) : 1533 - 1539
  • [45] Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function
    Kiehl, Erich L.
    Makki, Tarek
    Kumar, Rahul
    Gumber, Divya
    Kwon, Deborah H.
    Rickard, John W.
    Kanj, Mohamed
    Wazni, Oussama M.
    Saliba, Walid I.
    Varma, Niraj
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Cantillon, Daniel J.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2016, 13 (12) : 2272 - 2278
  • [46] Risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block comparison between right ventricular pacing sites using computed tomography
    Fruelund, P. Z.
    Sommer, A. M.
    Lundbye-Christensen, S.
    Zaremba, T.
    Soegaard, P.
    Graff, C.
    Vraa, S.
    Mahalingasivam, A. A.
    Pedersen, M. R.
    Riahi, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 704 - 704
  • [47] Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of definition, prevalence, risk factors, and management
    Somma, Vincenzo
    Ha, Francis J.
    Palmer, Sonny
    Mohamed, Uwais
    Agarwal, Sharad
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (02) : 282 - 290
  • [48] Right ventriculography to guide left bundle branch pacing in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a novel case report
    Dulay, Mansimran Singh
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Child, Nick
    Arnold, Ahran
    Tanner, Mark
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2024, 8 (10)
  • [49] Peri-left bundle branch pacing in a patient with right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular infra-Hisian block
    Wu, Shengjie
    Su, Lan
    Wang, Songjie
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Huang, Weijian
    EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (07):
  • [50] Apparent Acute Reversible Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Left Ventricular Dysfunction
    Te, Charles C.
    Stavrakis, Stavros
    Lozano, Pedro
    Reynolds, Dwight
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02) : 224 - 226