The Prevalence of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Patients With Long Term Right Ventricular Pacing - Is it a Matter Of Definition?

被引:46
|
作者
Kaye, Gerald [1 ,2 ]
Ng, Jun Yen [1 ]
Ahmed, Shameer [1 ]
Valencia, Diana [1 ]
Harrop, Danielle [1 ]
Ng, Arnold C. T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Adv Imaging, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION | 2019年 / 28卷 / 07期
关键词
Right ventricular pacing; Cardiomyopathy; Pacing induced cardiomyopathy; Prevalence; GRADE ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; HEART-FAILURE; EUROPEAN-ASSOCIATION; DUAL-CHAMBER; SITE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2018.05.196
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Chronic right ventricular pacing may contribute to deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing. Methods Patients attending a pacemaker clinic were retrospectively identified as having had transthoracic echocar-diographic LVEF measurement during the 12 months prior to device implantation. Those with card cardioverter-defibrillators or biventricular devices were excluded. The remaining patients were invited back for a repeat echocardiogram. Three (3) different definitions of PICM were employed: 1) follow-up LVEF of <= 40% if baseline LVEF was >= 50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF >= 5% if baseline LVEF was <50%; 2) follow-up LVEF of <= 40% if baseline LVEF was >= 50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF >= 10% if baseline LVEF was <= 50%; 3) absolute reduction in LVEF >= 10% irrespective of baseline LVEF. Alternate causes of cardiomyopathy were excluded following a chart review. Results The study cohort of 118 included 67 males (mean age 77.8 +/- 10.5 years) and 51 females (mean age 76.8 +/- 11.2 years). The mean time between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms was 3.5 + 1.4 years (range 1.5-6.4 years). The prevalence of PICM ranged from 5.9 to 39.0% depending on PICM definition. Multivariate analysis found that PICM was significantly associated with ventricular pacing burden (p = 0.013). Conclusions The prevalence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy is dependent on current accepted clinical definitions. A clear definition of PICM is required for a better understanding of the clinical implications of right ventricular pacing.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1033
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Prevalence and Predictors of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Younger Patients
    Li, Dan L.
    Yoneda, Zachary
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    Montgomery, Jay A.
    Shoemaker, Ben B.
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [2] Incidence and Predictors of Pacing-Induced Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
    Boyle, Thomas A.
    Pothineni, Naga Venkata K.
    Austin, Melissa
    Shivamurthy, Poojita
    Markman, Timothy
    Guandalini, Gustavo
    Hyman, Matthew
    Enriquez, Andres
    Fradley, Michael G.
    Schaller, Robert
    Supple, Gregory
    Deo, Rajat
    See, Vincent Y.
    Riley, Michael
    Garcia, Fermin
    Nazarian, Saman
    Lin, David
    Dixit, Sanjay
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    Callans, David
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    Frankel, David S.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 17 (10):
  • [3] Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
    Khurshid, Shaan
    Epstein, Andrew E.
    Verdino, Ralph J.
    Lin, David
    Goldberg, Lee R.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    Frankel, David S.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (09) : 1619 - 1625
  • [4] Pacing-induced right ventricular cardiomyopathy resynchronized using His bundle pacing
    Kamenik, Martin
    Osmancik, Pavel
    Stros, Petr
    Herman, Dalibor
    Vesela, Jana
    Prochazkova, Radka
    Curila, Karol
    COR ET VASA, 2020, 62 (01) : 80 - 84
  • [5] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy
    Nazeri, Alireza
    Massumi, Ali
    Rasekh, Abdi
    Saeed, Mohammad
    Frank, Christopher
    Razavi, Mehdi
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (01): : 37 - 40
  • [6] Mitigation of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy with superficial right ventricular mid-septal pacing: A long-term retrospective comparison with apical pacing
    McBride, Kenneth Wade
    Kulkarni, Nitin K.
    Hickman, Charles C.
    Link, Mark S.
    Takata, Theodore S.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 36 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [7] Additional factors underlying pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients who underwent right ventricular pacing and His bundle pacing
    Sener, Yusuf Ziya
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2024, 82 (01) : 115 - 116
  • [8] Biventricular pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing-induced heart failure
    Witte, Klaus K.
    Parker, John D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : E12 - E12
  • [9] Recovery of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy with Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Dogan, Mert
    Canpolat, Ugur
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 52 (05): : 357 - 361
  • [10] Outcomes of His-bundle pacing upgrade after long-term right ventricular pacing and/or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: Insights into disease progression
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Herweg, Bengt
    Dandamudi, Gopi
    Mittal, Suneet
    Bhatt, Advay G.
    Marcantoni, Lina
    Naperkowski, Angela
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Zanon, Francesco
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (10) : 1554 - 1561