A grey approach for forecasting in a supply chain during intermittent disruptions

被引:35
|
作者
Samvedi, Avinash [1 ]
Jain, Vipul [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Mech Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Supply chain risk management; Grey prediction method; Bullwhip effect; Forecasting; Simulation; GENETIC ALGORITHM; INDUSTRY; PREDICTION; SYSTEM; OUTPUT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2012.12.002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The supply chains today have become vulnerable to frequent disruptions, and with continuing emphasis on efficiency, lacks robustness to deal with them. A part of the solution lies in forecasting the disruption beforehand and the other part in knowing which policies will suit such disrupted conditions best. Accurate and immediate forecasts are a must in a supply chain and hence play a huge role in stabilizing. This study compares the performance of three established forecasting methods (moving average, weighted moving average and exponential smoothing) as well as grey prediction method, during disruptions and stable situations. The experiments are performed in the form of discrete event simulation, on a four stage beer game settings. The results show that moving average and weighted moving average methods become incompetent during disruptions, and are useful only during stable times, when the demand hovers around a predefined mean value. Exponential smoothing and grey method seems to give better results during disruptions and also during stable times in upstream tiers. Grey prediction method in particular is the best method when the disruption frequency is high and also when the disruption impact is gradual rather than sudden. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1051
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mitigating manifest supply chain disruptions
    Riley, Jason M.
    Klein, Richard
    Miller, Janis
    Sridharan, V.
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (05): : 939 - 957
  • [32] Technology Combats Supply Chain Disruptions
    Stern, Renee
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (05) : 2 - 4
  • [33] Quantifying Disruptions Propagation in a Supply Chain
    Tan, C. S.
    Tan, P. S.
    Lee, S. S. G.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 1668 - 1672
  • [34] The Effect of Supply Disruptions on Supply Chain Design Decisions
    Qi, Lian
    Shen, Zuo-Jun Max
    Snyder, Lawrence V.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 44 (02) : 274 - 289
  • [35] Forecasting Intermittent Demand Based On Grey Theory
    Zhang Jiantong
    Lv Biyu
    [J]. ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 49 - 52
  • [36] A dynamic game approach to demand disruptions of green supply chain with government intervention (case study: automotive supply chain)
    Tahereh Zaefarian
    Atieh Fander
    Saeed Yaghoubi
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 336 : 1965 - 2008
  • [37] A dynamic game approach to demand disruptions of green supply chain with government intervention (case study: automotive supply chain)
    Zaefarian, Tahereh
    Fander, Atieh
    Yaghoubi, Saeed
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 336 (03) : 1965 - 2008
  • [38] Redesigning global supply chains during compounding geopolitical disruptions: the role of supply chain logics
    Roscoe, Samuel
    Aktas, Emel
    Petersen, Kenneth J.
    Skipworth, Heather Dawn
    Handfield, Robert B.
    Habib, Farooq
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 42 (09) : 1407 - 1434
  • [39] Achieving supply chain resilience in an era of disruptions: a configuration approach of capacities and strategies
    Gaudenzi, Barbara
    Pellegrino, Roberta
    Confente, Ilenia
    [J]. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 28 (07) : 97 - 111
  • [40] Real options approach to evaluate postponement as supply chain disruptions mitigation strategy
    Carbonara, Nunzia
    Pellegrino, Roberta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (15) : 5249 - 5271