Maintenance Facility Location Optimization Review

被引:1
|
作者
Holik, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Syst, Texas A&M Transportat Inst TTI, San Antonio, TX 78224 USA
关键词
SERVICES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0361198118821674
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
State departments of transportation (DOTs) are responsible for operating and maintaining the highway system in a safe and efficient manner to facilitate the movement of people and goods. Maintenance facilities play a critical role in the operations of DOTs by storing equipment and materials, providing a base of operation for department of transportation personnel, and serving as the beginning and ending location for maintenance activities. Maintenance activities occur year-round, but winter maintenance activities are typically the most time and resource intensive for northern state DOTs. Maintenance operations generally consist of facilities, routes, and equipment. The life spans of maintenance facilities are typically measured in decades, which compounds any inefficiencies in their locations over a long time horizon. Less research has been conducted to optimize facility locations than routes and fleets. This paper reviews the available literature related to facility optimization, including maintenance facilities and non-maintenance facilities. Several specific takeaways were documented from the research reviewed. DOTs have conducted research to optimize the locations of their facilities. These works have typically examined a small area and included only a few facilities. The larger-scale optimizations only located facilities at the town level. A second level of facilities may be necessary to improve the cost effectiveness of the optimization. Such facilities could include material storage depots strategically placed between maintenance sections to reduce the amount of deadheading. At a certain point, further consolidation of maintenance facilities will increase the overall costs because more vehicles and staff are required to reach the further extents of maintenance areas.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 299
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Facility Location and Supply Chain Optimization for a Biorefinery
    Bowling, Ian M.
    Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (10) : 6276 - 6286
  • [22] A facility location approach to sensor placement optimization
    Berry, Jonathan W.
    Hart, William E.
    Phillips, Cindy A.
    Watson, Jean-Paul
    [J]. 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium 2006, 2007,
  • [23] A framework of photovoltaics recycling facility location optimization
    Guo, Qi
    Kluse, Christopher
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, 23 : 105 - 110
  • [24] On some optimization problems in obnoxious facility location
    Qin, ZP
    Xu, YF
    Zhu, BH
    [J]. COMPUTING AND COMBINATORICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1858 : 320 - 329
  • [25] Simulation based optimization of a train maintenance facility
    Hani, Yasmina
    Amodeo, Lionel
    Yalaoui, Farouk
    Chen, Haoxun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2008, 19 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [26] Simulation based optimization of a train maintenance facility
    Yasmina Hani
    Lionel Amodeo
    Farouk Yalaoui
    Haoxun Chen
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2008, 19 : 293 - 300
  • [27] A novel hybrid GA-PSO optimization technique for multi-location facility maintenance scheduling problem
    Sedeh, Omid Motamedi
    Ostadi, Bakhtiar
    Zagia, Farank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 40
  • [28] A review on maintenance optimization
    de Jonge, Bram
    Scarf, Philip A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (03) : 805 - 824
  • [29] Facility location and supply chain management - A review
    Melo, M. T.
    Nickel, S.
    Saldanha-da-Gama, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 196 (02) : 401 - 412
  • [30] Optimization models for the dynamic facility location and allocation problem
    Manzini, Riccardo
    Gebennini, Elisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (08) : 2061 - 2086