Model building by comparison at CASP3: Using expert knowledge and computer automation

被引:0
|
作者
Bates, PA [1 ]
Sternberg, MJE [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Canc Res Fund, Biomolec Modelling Lab, London WC2A 3PX, England
关键词
bioinformatics; protein prediction; comparative protein modeling; homology modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ten models were constructed for the comparative modeling section of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction-3 (CASP3). Sequence identity between each target and the best possible parent(s) ranged between 12% and 64%. The modeling protocol is a mixture of automated computer algorithms with human intervention at certain critical stages, In particular, intervention is required to check sequence alignments and the selection of parameters for various computer programs. Seven of the targets were constructed from single-parent templates, and three were constructed from multiple parents, The reasons for such a high ratio of modeling from single parents only are discussed. Models constructed from multiple parents were found to be more accurate than models constructed from single parents only. A novel loop-modeling algorithm is presented that consists of fragment database searches, several fragment libraries, and mean-field calculations on representative fragment candidates. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] KNOWLEDGE-BASED EXPERT SYSTEMS FOR NORMATIVE DECISION MODELING - A COMPUTER-MODEL OF FINANCIAL DIAGNOSTIC REASONING
    CHATFIELD, AT
    DATA BASE, 1987, 18 (03): : 43 - 43
  • [32] Automation and Decision Support in the Area of Nephrology Using Numerical Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, and Expert Approach: Review of the Current State of Knowledge
    Pawus, Dawid
    Porazko, Tomasz
    Paszkiel, Szczepan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 86043 - 86066
  • [33] Revision and improvement of the PTVA-3 model for assessing tsunami building vulnerability using “international expert judgment”: introducing the PTVA-4 model
    F. Dall’Osso
    D. Dominey-Howes
    C. Tarbotton
    S. Summerhayes
    G. Withycombe
    Natural Hazards, 2016, 83 : 1229 - 1256
  • [34] Revision and improvement of the PTVA-3 model for assessing tsunami building vulnerability using "international expert judgment": introducing the PTVA-4 model
    Dall'Osso, F.
    Dominey-Howes, D.
    Tarbotton, C.
    Summerhayes, S.
    Withycombe, G.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 83 (02) : 1229 - 1256
  • [35] Expert computer knowledge-based methodology using fuzzy sets for evaluating water conservation programs in Jordan
    Odeh Al-Jayyousi
    Rustom Mamlook
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2003, 4 (4) : 257 - 263
  • [36] KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH OF BUILDING PLAN CHECKER SYSTEM USING COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD) BUILDING PLAN
    Sanusi, Nurazlina Md
    Mustafa, Nuridawati
    Kasmuri, Emaliana
    Azmi, Mohd Sanusi
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 8 - 10
  • [37] Classification of compact objects and model comparison using EOS knowledge
    Koehn, Hauke
    Wouters, Thibeau
    Rose, Henrik
    Pang, Peter T. H.
    Somasundaram, Rahul
    Tews, Ingo
    Dietrich, Tim
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (10)
  • [38] Using Consensus Building Procedures With Expert Raters to Establish Comparison Scores of Behavior for Direct Behavior Rating
    Jaffery, Rose
    Johnson, Austin H.
    Bowler, Mark C.
    Riley-Tillman, T. Chris
    Chafouleas, Sandra M.
    Harrison, Sayward E.
    ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2015, 40 (04) : 195 - 204
  • [39] An Efficient Workflow for Generation and Refinement of a Knowledge Based Planning Model for Pancreas SBRT Using Automation
    Patton, T.
    Diot, Q.
    Jones, B.
    Olsen, L.
    Vinogradskiy, Y.
    Goodman, K.
    Schefter, T.
    Thomas, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E367 - E367
  • [40] Science Education for Social Justice Using the Knowledge-Building Communities Model
    Reeve, Richard
    Sharkawy, Azza
    LEARNING LANDSCAPES, 2014, 7 (02): : 283 - 298