THE YIELDING OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) UNDER DIFFERENT TILLAGE CONDITIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Wozniak, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci Lublin, PL-20950 Lublin, Poland
来源
关键词
pea; tillage systems; yield structure; LONG-TERM TILLAGE; REDUCED TILLAGE; SOIL PROPERTIES; CROP-ROTATION; WHEAT YIELD; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; GROWTH; FERTILIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, however, a lower crop yield is achieved in the no-tillage system than in the ploughing system. The reported study evaluated the yielding of pea under conventional (ploughing) tillage (shallow ploughing and harrowing after harvest of the previous crop, ploughing in the autumn), reduced tillage (only cultivator after harvest of the previous crop) and herbicide tillage (only Roundup 360 SL after harvest of the previous crop). The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one - by 40.8% - in the herbicide tillage. The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m(2), the number of grains per 1 m(2), and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage. The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m(2), grain number per 1 m(2), grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m(2). Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m(2) and grain number per 1 m(2), as well as between plant number per 1 m(2) and pod number per 1 m(2), and between plant number per 1 m(2) and grain number per plant.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The first record of tetrasomy in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Kosterin, Oleg E.
    Galieva, Elvira R.
    Bogdanova, Vera S.
    EUPHYTICA, 2009, 166 (01) : 109 - 121
  • [22] Modelling nitrogen fixation of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Eckersten, H
    Af Geijersstam, L
    Torssell, B
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 56 (02): : 129 - 137
  • [23] Analysis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) supernodulating mutants
    Sidorova, KK
    Shumnyi, VK
    GENETIKA, 1998, 34 (10): : 1452 - 1454
  • [24] Genetic control of fasciation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    A. A. Sinjushin
    S. A. Gostimskii
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2008, 44 : 702 - 708
  • [25] The first record of tetrasomy in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Oleg E. Kosterin
    Elvira R. Galieva
    Vera S. Bogdanova
    Euphytica, 2009, 166 : 109 - 121
  • [26] Genetic control of fasciation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Sinjushin, A. A.
    Gostimskii, S. A.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2008, 44 (06) : 702 - 708
  • [27] Bioavailability and Rhizotoxicity of Cd to Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Wu, Yonghong
    Hendershot, William H.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2010, 208 (1-4): : 29 - 42
  • [28] Selection of high-yielding, high-tech varieties of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Ayupov, D. S.
    Davletov, F. A.
    Asylbaev, I. G.
    Kuznetsov, I. Yu
    Davletov, I. I.
    Dmitriev, A. M.
    Vakhitova, R. K.
    Satarov, M. Yu
    Avsakhov, F. F.
    Irgalina, R. Sh
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (05) : 615 - 619
  • [29] Degradation of stromal proteins in pea (Pisum sativum L) chloroplasts under oxidising conditions
    Stieger, PA
    Feller, U
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 151 (05) : 556 - 562
  • [30] Effect of biostimulants on soil characteristics, plant growth and yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) under field conditions
    Ismaiel, Shimaa Abdel-Rahman
    Khedr, Fawzy Gamal
    Metwally, Amira Galal
    Soror, Abdel-Fattah Salah
    PLANT SCIENCE TODAY, 2022, 9 (03): : 650 - 657