A Functional Assessment of the Impact of Advantages and Disadvantages on Breastfeeding Attitude

被引:0
|
作者
Van Acker, Frederik [1 ]
Bakker, Esther [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
来源
PSICOLOGICA | 2012年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
NETHERLANDS; PREVENTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although health and other benefits of breastfeeding for mother and child have been repeatedly shown, there is still a large proportion of women who do not initiate or continue breastfeeding. The aim of the current study is to analyze the contribution of the presentation of advantages and disadvantages of breastfeeding in developing an attitude towards breastfeeding among Dutch and Flemish women of reproductive age. In a functional measurement experiment factorial combinations of advantages and disadvantages of breastfeeding were presented to a group of women between 18 and 45 years. Women rated their attitude towards breastfeeding after each presentation of a combination of arguments. The results show that information on health related advantages produces the most positive attitude towards breastfeeding. Practical disadvantages were found to be the least important determinants of attitude. Three types of response patterns could be distinguished using cluster analysis. Although an averaging type integration rule was expected, the results suggest that some women do not take all information from the presented advantages and disadvantages into account to form an overall attitude towards breastfeeding. One cluster showed no main effect for advantages, only a small effect for disadvantages, but a main effect of attitude prior to the experiment. The second cluster showed a large main effect for advantages and only a modest effect for disadvantages. In the third cluster, both advantages and disadvantages impacted similarly on attitude. An averaging type integration rule could be discerned in the second and the third cluster. The current results imply that campaigns to promote breastfeeding should take into account differences between target populations.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 545
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE LASER
    ARONOFF, BL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1982, 357 : 86 - 88
  • [32] MUSCULOPLASTY - ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
    RAMOB, JHT
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1965, 74 (02): : 535 - &
  • [33] The advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing
    Stapf, J
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2002, 94 (04): : 66 - 68
  • [34] THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
    Gavrilescu, Cristina-Maria
    Paraschiv, Cringuta
    Horjinec, Paloma
    Sotropa, Diana-Maria
    Barbu, Roxana-Mihaela
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 10 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [35] USE OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, IMPACT ON THE WORLD ECONOMY
    Cesarec, Marijana
    Matkovic, Bianca
    Troselj, Franjo
    INTERDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH XVII (IMR 2021), 2021, : 240 - 261
  • [36] Fish: a Natural Functional Food Advantages of Eating Food Outweigh the Disadvantages
    Falkenburg, Patricia
    ERNAHRUNGS UMSCHAU, 2010, 57 (05): : B17 - 251
  • [37] Advantages and disadvantages of physiological assessment for next generation control room design
    Tran, Tuan Q.
    Boring, Ronald L.
    Dudenhoeffer, Donald D.
    Hallbert, Bruce P.
    Keller, M. David
    Anderson, Tessa M.
    2007 IEEE 8TH HUMAN FACTORS AND POWER PLANTS AND HPRCT 13TH ANNUAL MEETING, 2007, : 259 - +
  • [38] ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE INVOLVEMENT OF COMPUTER-AIDED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM IN MATHEMATICS
    Berkova, Andrea
    Kulicka, Jiri
    EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 8493 - 8500
  • [39] IMPACT OF LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH NEUROLEPTICS ON COMMUNITY - ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
    SHEPHERD, M
    WATT, DC
    JOURNAL DE PHARMACOLOGIE, 1974, 5 : 50 - 50
  • [40] Continuous speech recognition in MR imaging reporting: Advantages, disadvantages, and impact
    Chaljub, G
    Ramaswamy, MR
    Esch, O
    Fanning, DD
    VanSonnenberg, E
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 329 - 329