A Comparison among Classical and SDRE Techniques in Formation Flying Orbital Control

被引:0
|
作者
Felicetti, Leonard [1 ]
Palmerini, Giovanni B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, DIAEE, I-00138 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A key point in formation flying mission design is represented by the accuracy and the cost of maintaining the requested orbital configuration. In fact, the relative geometry among spacecraft should be kept within tight limits in order to accomplish payload missions. At the same time, this effort requires to accommodate onboard the relevant amount of propellant, which should be correctly evaluated. The quest for optimal control strategy faces the non linear nature of the orbital dynamics, furthermore affected by perturbations that can be only modeled and therefore not perfectly known. As a result, traditional optimal strategies as the Linear Quadratic Controller (LQR), which design can be achieved under the hypothesis of simplified (as an example linearized) dynamics, not always meet the objective. Innovative approaches, like the State Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) technique, allow to better take into account, at an increasing level of approximations, the real dynamics. The paper presents extensive results of the simulations carried out for two different problems in formation flying control: the maintaining of a desired relative geometry and the acquisition of a requested configuration. A relevant point, also with respect to currently available literature, is the fact that the considered reference orbits have an eccentricity different from zero.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] APPLICATION OF SDRE TECHNIQUE TO ORBITAL AND ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT FORMATION FLYING
    Massari, Mauro
    Zamaro, Mattia
    [J]. FIRST IAA CONFERENCE ON DYNAMICS AND CONTROL OF SPACE SYSTEMS 2012, PTS I AND II, 2012, 145 : 1323 - 1342
  • [2] Application of SDRE technique to orbital and attitude control of spacecraft formation flying
    Massari, Mauro
    Zamaro, Mattia
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2014, 94 (01) : 409 - 420
  • [3] SDRE Control with Nonlinear J2 Perturbations for Nanosatellite Formation Flying
    Bilal, Mohd
    Vijayan, Ria
    Schilling, Klaus
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (12): : 448 - 453
  • [4] Software implementation of Autonomous Orbital Control for Formation Flying
    Xu, Ming
    Du, Shanshan
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. 26TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (2014 CCDC), 2014, : 4431 - 4436
  • [5] Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
    Zhang Ke
    He Zhenqi
    Lv Meibo
    [J]. OPEN PHYSICS, 2017, 15 (01): : 394 - 399
  • [6] FORMATION FLYING: RELATIVE ORBITS' MODELLING AND CONTROL THROUGH EULERIAN ORBITAL ELEMENTS
    Gaias, Gabriella V. M.
    Lavagna, Michele R.
    Golikov, Alexei R.
    Ovchinnikov, Michael Yu.
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2009, VOL 134, PTS I-III, 2009, 134 : 1271 - +
  • [7] Optimal Orbital Control without Radial Thrust Based on SDRE Method
    Zhang, Xiang-Yu
    Zhang, Gang
    Cao, Xi-Bin
    [J]. Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics, 2017, 38 (10): : 1057 - 1067
  • [8] ATTITUDE SYNCHRONIZATION OF SPACECRAFT FORMATION FLYING VIA THE SDRE CONTROLLER USING REACTION WHEELS
    Jung, Junoh
    Chang, Insu
    Park, Sang-Young
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2010, PTS I-III, 2010, 136 : 2353 - +
  • [9] An orbital design method for satellite formation flying
    Hai-Ying Cui
    Jun-Feng Li
    Yun-Feng Gao
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2006, 20
  • [10] Navigation Accuracy Guidelines for Orbital Formation Flying
    J. Russell Carpenter
    Kyle T. Alfriend
    [J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2005, 53 (2) : 207 - 219