Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study

被引:2
|
作者
Dempsey, Kathy [1 ,2 ]
Saw, Robyn [2 ,3 ]
Bartula, Iris [3 ]
Lo, Serigne [3 ]
Lawn, Craig [3 ]
Pennington, Thomas [3 ]
Spillane, Andrew [2 ,3 ]
Boyle, Frances [2 ,3 ]
Dong, Skye [3 ]
Dieng, Mbathio [1 ,2 ]
Milne, Donna [4 ]
Seaman, Linda [3 ]
Saks, Dina [3 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [3 ]
Thompson, Jake Robert [3 ]
Morton, Rachael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Melanoma Inst Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 12期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Quality in health care; MENTAL HEALTH; Dermatological tumours; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Organisation of health services; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; RECOGNITION; DEPRESSION; QUALITY; PRO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066852
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe benefits of patient-reported feedback, using questionnaires that allow patients to report how they feel and function without any interpretation from healthcare professionals, are well established. However, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are not routinely collected in patients with melanoma in Australia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing electronic PROMs (ePROMs) into routine care from the perspectives of patients with stage III melanoma and their treating clinical team.Methods and analysisA minimum of 50 patients and 5 clinicians will be recruited to this prospective, longitudinal pilot study (ePROMs-MELanoma). The study uses a mixed-methods approach (quantitative PROMs questionnaires and end-of-study surveys with qualitative interviews) and commenced in May 2021 in surgical and medical melanoma clinics at two sites in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. The primary outcomes are measures of feasibility and acceptability, comprising descriptive questionnaire completion statistics, and proportion of patients who reported that these PROMs were easy to complete and measured items they considered important. Clinician and clinic staff views will be canvassed on the appropriateness of these PROMs for their patients, change in referral practice and uptake and incorporation into routine practice. Secondary aims include measurement of improvements in patients' emotional and physical health and well-being, and utility of real-time data capture and clinician feedback. All participants will complete the Distress Thermometer and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires in the clinic using a tablet computer at baseline and two to three subsequent follow-up appointments. Participants who report a score of 4 or higher on the Distress Thermometer will be triaged to complete an additional three questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire-28. Results will be generated in real time; patients with psychosocial distress or poor quality of life will discuss possible referral to appropriate allied health services with their clinician. Thematic analysis of interviews will be conducted.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval obtained from St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 September 2019 (2019/ETH10558), with amendments approved on 8 June 2022. Patient consent is obtained electronically prior to questionnaire commencement. Dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international conferences, tailored presentations for clinical societies and government bodies, organisational reporting through multidisciplinary meetings and research symposia for local clinicians and clinic staff, and more informal, lay reports and presentations for consumer melanoma representative bodies and patient participants and their families.Trial registration numberACTRN12620001149954.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of patient-reported outcome measures by healthcare professionals in specialized asthma management centers in French-speaking Belgium: A mixed-methods study
    Louis, Gilles
    Voz, Bernard
    Guillaume, Michele
    Kirkove, Delphine
    Petre, Benoit
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [32] A qualitative study of patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in the management of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (PRO-trACK project)
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Stringer, Stephanie
    Dutton, Mary
    Walmsley-Allen, Natalie
    Slade, Anita
    McMullan, Christel
    Calvert, Melanie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S95 - S96
  • [33] Study protocol to develop a patient-reported outcome measuring disability associated with unilateral vocal fold paralysis: a mixed-methods approach with the CoPE collaborative
    Fernandes-Taylor, Sara
    Smith, Cara Damico
    Arroyo, Natalia
    Bonnet, Kemberlee
    Schlundt, David
    Wichmann, Margarete
    Feurer, Irene
    Francis, David O.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [34] Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study
    Torbjornsen, Astrid
    Spildo, Ingeborg
    Mollestad, Maria Aadland
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    Singstad, Tone
    Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
    Joranger, Pal
    Ribu, Lis
    Holmen, Heidi
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [35] Longitudinal study of symptom burden in outpatients with advanced cancers based on electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) platform: a single institution, prospective study protocol
    Tang, Lili
    Pang, Ying
    He, Yi
    Shi, Qiuling
    Han, Xinkun
    Li, Zimeng
    Zhou, Chengcheng
    Zhou, Yuhe
    He, Shuangzhi
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Yening
    Song, Lili
    Wang, Bingmei
    Li, Xiumin
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [36] Clinical integration of patient-reported outcome measures to enhance the care of patients with SLE: a multi-centre prospective cohort study
    Kasturi, Shanthini
    Price, Lori Lyn
    LeClair, Amy
    Patel, Neena
    Shetty, Shreya
    Sheira, Dina
    Weber, Serena
    Curtis, David
    Nowell, W. Benjamin
    Salmon, Jane
    Terrin, Norma
    McAlindon, Timothy E.
    Mandl, Lisa A.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 61 (12) : 4763 - 4774
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease – a four-phase mixed methods study
    Esmee M. van der Willik
    Yvette Meuleman
    Karen Prantl
    Giel van Rijn
    Willem Jan W. Bos
    Frans J. van Ittersum
    Hans A. J. Bart
    Marc H. Hemmelder
    Friedo W. Dekker
    BMC Nephrology, 20
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - a four-phase mixed methods study
    van der Willik, Esmee M.
    Meuleman, Yvette
    Prantl, Karen
    van Rijn, Giel
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    van Ittersum, Frans J.
    Bart, Hans A. J.
    Hemmelder, Marc H.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [39] An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    Jan, Stephen
    Descallar, Joseph
    Marks, Guy B.
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [40] An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol
    Sheree M. S. Smith
    Stephen Jan
    Joseph Descallar
    Guy B. Marks
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 5