Defining Success in Adult Basic Education Settings: Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Perspectives

被引:11
|
作者
Tighe, Elizabeth L. [1 ]
Barnes, Adrienne E. [2 ]
Connor, Carol M. [3 ]
Steadman, Sharilyn C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Cognit Psychol Dept, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Educ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Interdisciplinary Learning Sci Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, Coll Educ, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
Motivation/engagement; Persistence; Research methodology; Ethnography; Mixed methods; Strategies; methods; and materials; Instructional strategies; teaching strategies; Struggling learners; To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply; Adult; SCHOOL; INSTRUCTION; CLASSROOMS;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.57
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study employed quantitative and qualitative research approaches to investigate what constitutes success in adult basic education (ABE) programs from the perspectives of multiple educational stakeholders: the state funding agency, the teachers, and the students. Success was defined in multiple ways. In the quantitative section of the study, we computed classroom value-added scores (used as a metric of the state's definition of success) to identify more and less effective ABE classrooms in two Florida counties. In the qualitative section of the study, we observed and conducted interviews with teachers and students in the selected classrooms to investigate how these stakeholders defined success in ABE. Iterative consideration of the qualitative data revealed three principal markers of success: (1) instructional strategies and teacher-student interactions, (2) views on standardized testing, and (3) student motivational factors. In general, classrooms with higher value-added scores were characterized by multiple instructional approaches, positive and collaborative teacher-student interactions, and students engaging in goal setting and citing motivational factors such as family and personal fulfillment. The implications for ABE programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 435
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Embracing multiple stakeholders’ perspectives in defining competent simulation facilitators’ characteristics and educational behaviours: a qualitative study from Denmark, Korea, and Australia
    Margrethe Duch Christensen
    Doris Østergaard
    Søren Stagelund
    Leonie Watterson
    Hyun Soo Chung
    Peter Dieckmann
    Advances in Simulation, 8
  • [42] Embracing multiple stakeholders' perspectives in defining competent simulation facilitators' characteristics and educational behaviours: a qualitative study from Denmark, Korea, and Australia
    Christensen, Margrethe Duch
    Ostergaard, Doris
    Stagelund, Soren
    Watterson, Leonie
    Chung, Hyun Soo
    Dieckmann, Peter
    ADVANCES IN SIMULATION, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [43] E-LEARNING SUCCESS: AN ANALYSIS OF DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESS FROM MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES
    Goeman, K.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010), 2010, : 1124 - 1124
  • [44] FUNDAMENTALS OF GIFTED EDUCATION Considering Multiple Perspectives
    Arrigoni, Jasna
    DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2015, 24 (04): : 579 - 583
  • [45] Simulation of multiple perspectives in road safety education
    Rowland, G
    Wright, R
    Harper, B
    ED-MEDIA 2004: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vols. 1-7, 2004, : 1602 - 1608
  • [46] Curriculum differentiation: multiple perspectives and developments in education
    Terwel, J
    JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 2005, 37 (06) : 653 - 670
  • [47] Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood education
    Haight, WL
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 44 (01): : 87 - 88
  • [48] Fundamentals of Gifted Education: Considering Multiple Perspectives
    Sriraman, Bharath
    ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2014, 36 (02): : 133 - 134
  • [49] Adolescent Pregnancy and Challenges in Kenyan Context: Perspectives from Multiple Community Stakeholders
    Kumar M.
    Huang K.-Y.
    Othieno C.
    Wamalwa D.
    Madeghe B.
    Osok J.
    Kahonge S.N.
    Nato J.
    McKay M.M.K.
    Global Social Welfare, 2018, 5 (1) : 11 - 27
  • [50] Patients and clinicians as stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: multiple perspectives and evolving roles
    Williams, Sunyna S.
    Esposito, Dominick
    Rich, Eugene C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (06) : 573 - 575