Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective at Preventing OHSS for Potentially High Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI?

被引:17
|
作者
Xing, Weijie [1 ]
Lin, Haiyan [2 ]
Li, Yu [2 ]
Yang, Dongzi [2 ]
Wang, Wenjun [2 ]
Zhang, Qingxue [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Ctr Reprod Med, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION SYNDROME; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; STIMULATION; AGONIST; PREDICTION; HORMONE; GANIRELIX; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0140286
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To determine if the GnRH antagonist protocol is effective in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in potentially high responders. Methods A total of 660 IVF-ET/ICSI cycles were retrospectively identified. The inclusion criterion was age <= 30 years. Cycles were divided into two groups: a GnRHa group and a GnRHant group. In the GnRHa group, the patients received one single injection of 1.0mg-1.3mg Triptorelin in previous mid-luteal phase. In the GnRHant group, a daily dose of 0.25 mg Cetrotide was initiated when a lead follicle obtained a mean diameter of 14 mm, continued up until the day of hCG administration. The duration of stimulation, total dose of Gn, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and OHSS rate were compared. Results The duration of stimulation, E-2 level on hCG day, numbers of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, and high-quality embryos in the GnRHa group were all significantly more than those in the GnRHant group. In the GnRHa group, 83.53% of cancelled fresh-transferred cycles were cancelled because of high risk of OHSS, which was significantly higher than that in the GnRHant group (43.55%, P<0.05). The incidence of OHSS in the GnRHa group was slightly higher than that in the GnRHant group. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in the GnRHa group were significantly higher than those in the GnRHant group (37.36% VS 19.25%, 62.78% VS 31.06%; P<0.05). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that for potentially high responders, the GnRHant protocol can, to some extent, lower the cancellation and incidence rates of OHSS. The GnRHa protocol was superior to the GnRHant protocol in terms of implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GnRH agonist stop antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in ovarian poor responders undergoing IVF
    Khezri, Atefeh
    Kashani, Ladan
    Moini, Ashraf
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Yamini, Nazila
    Ataee, Mina
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2022, 17 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [2] GnRH agonists stop antagonist protocolversus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Khezri, Atefeh
    Kashani, Ladan
    Moini, Ashraf
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Yamini, Nazila
    Ataee, Mina
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2022, 17 (05): : 365 - 370
  • [3] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2742 - 2749
  • [4] Effectiveness of a GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI patients found to be at high risk for OHSS in a previous cycle with a GnRH agonist
    Vegetti, W.
    Ragni, G.
    Riccaboni, A.
    Engl, B.
    Brigante, C.
    Crosignani, P. G.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 131 - 131
  • [5] Estradiol Pretreatment in an Ultrashort GnRH Combined with a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in A Cohort of Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI: A Case-control Study
    Siristatidis, Charalampos
    Salamalekis, George
    Vogiatzi, Paraskevi
    Vrantza, Tereza
    Matsota, Paraskevi
    Pergialiotis, Vasileios
    Papantoniou, Nikolaos
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2016, 30 (06): : 945 - 950
  • [6] Low dose GnRH-a protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in the management of poor responders undergoing IVF.
    Melo, M. A., Sr.
    Busso, C. E., Sr.
    Domingo, J., Sr.
    Soares, S. R., Sr.
    Remohi, J., Sr.
    Pellicer, A., Sr.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S415 - S415
  • [7] Pregnancy outcome in delayed start antagonist versus microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: An RCT
    Davar, Robab
    Neghab, Nosrat
    Naghshineh, Elham
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 16 (04) : 255 - 260
  • [8] Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF
    Akman, MA
    Erden, HF
    Tosun, SB
    Bayazit, N
    Aksoy, E
    Bahceci, M
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) : 2145 - 2147
  • [9] The effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist protocol on folliculogenesis in IVF/ICSI
    Mochtar, MH
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (08) : 1713 - 1718
  • [10] Estradiol pretreatment in GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment
    Zhu, Shaomi
    Lv, Zhexi
    Song, Linjiang
    Zhang, Qinxiu
    Fan, Yiyue
    Li, Junjun
    [J]. OPEN MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (01): : 1811 - 1820