GnRH agonists stop antagonist protocolversus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF

被引:0
|
作者
Khezri, Atefeh [1 ]
Kashani, Ladan [2 ]
Moini, Ashraf [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid [1 ]
Yamini, Nazila [6 ]
Ataee, Mina [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Womens Hosp, Infertil Ward, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Hosp, Infertil Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] ACECR, Reprod Biomed Res Ctr, Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Dept Endocrinol & Female Infertil, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Breast Dis Res Ctr, Canc Inst, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Arash Womens Hosp, Dept ART, IVF Lab, Tehran, Iran
[7] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med Sci, Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Social Determinants Hlth, Karaj, Iran
[8] ACECR, Reprod Biotechnol Res Ctr, Avicenna Res Inst, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Gonadotropin; Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist; GnRH antagonist; Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles; Poor Ovarian Response (POR); STIMULATION; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.5281/zenodo.7369730
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Introduction and objective: This study aims to clarify if the GnRH agonist STOP-antagonist protocol versus the GnRH antagonist protocol can be useful in improving IVF (In vitro fertilization) outcomes in patients with poor ovarian response candidates for IVF. Methods: The present study was conducted as a single-blind clinical trial in the infertility ward of Arash Hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. In this study, 133 patients with a poor ovarian response (POR) according to Bologna criteria were randomly assigned to two groups GnRH agonist stop-antagonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol. The number of dominant follicles and number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos and their grade, level of antagonist used, level of gonadotropin used, length of days of stimulation and endometrial thickness, level of estrogen, level of progesterone, trigger day, and fertilization rate were measured. Results: In the present study, the frequency of dominant follicles in the GnRH agonist stop-antagonist group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist group (p-value = 0.01). The number of embryos in the GnRH agonist stop antagonist group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist group (p-value = 0.02). The percentage of AB embryo agonists in the GnRH agonist stop_anta group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist group (p-value = 0.003). The number of mature oocytes in the GnRH agonist stop_antagonist group was more than that in the GnRH antagonist group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The number of used gonadotropin doses in the GnRH agonist stop_antagonist group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH antagonist group (p-value = 0.01). The number of used antagonists in the GnRH antagonist group was significantly higher than that in the GnRH agonist stop_antagonist group (p-value = 0.02). Conclusion: The GnRH agonist stop-Anta protocol is a valuable tool for the treatment of poor ovarian responders. However, controlled prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GnRH agonist stop antagonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in ovarian poor responders undergoing IVF
    Khezri, Atefeh
    Kashani, Ladan
    Moini, Ashraf
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Yamini, Nazila
    Ataee, Mina
    [J]. REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE HIPERTENSION, 2022, 17 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [2] Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2742 - 2749
  • [3] Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF
    Akman, MA
    Erden, HF
    Tosun, SB
    Bayazit, N
    Aksoy, E
    Bahceci, M
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) : 2145 - 2147
  • [4] Low dose GnRH-a protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in the management of poor responders undergoing IVF.
    Melo, M. A., Sr.
    Busso, C. E., Sr.
    Domingo, J., Sr.
    Soares, S. R., Sr.
    Remohi, J., Sr.
    Pellicer, A., Sr.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S415 - S415
  • [5] GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial
    Cheung, LP
    Lam, PM
    Lok, IH
    Chiu, TTY
    Yeung, SY
    Tjer, CC
    Haines, CJ
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) : 616 - 621
  • [6] Comparison of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF (vol 26, pg 2742, 2011)
    Pu, Danhua
    Wu, Jie
    Liu, Jiayin
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (04) : 1230 - 1230
  • [7] Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders
    Mutlu, Mehmet Firat
    Mutlu, Ilknur
    Erdem, Mehmet
    Guler, Ismail
    Erdem, Ahmet
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 47 (02) : 470 - 475
  • [8] GnRH antagonist in poor responders undergoing ART
    Ferraretti, A. P.
    Gianaroli, L.
    Balicchia, B.
    Iammarrone, E.
    Bafaro, G.
    Magli, M. C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 148 - 149
  • [9] GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonists protocol in PCOS patients undergoing IVF treatment
    Moshin, V.
    Croitor, M.
    Hotineanu, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I121 - I122
  • [10] Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-Antagonist Versus GnRH-Agonist in Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders Undergoing IVF
    Sozos J. Fasouliotis
    Neri Laufer
    Shelley Sabbagh-Ehrlich
    Aby Lewin
    Arye Hurwitz
    Alex Simon
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2003, 20 : 455 - 460