A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of first-line fidaxomicin for patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Germany

被引:27
|
作者
Watt, Maureen [1 ,3 ]
McCrea, Charles [2 ]
Johal, Sukhvinder [2 ]
Posnett, John [2 ]
Nazir, Jameel [1 ]
机构
[1] Astellas EMEA, Chertsey, England
[2] PAREXEL Access Consulting, London, England
[3] Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, 2000 Hillswood Dr, Chertsey KT16 0RS, England
关键词
Clostridium difficile; Cost-effectiveness; Budget impact; Fidaxomicin; Vancomycin; ECONOMIC BURDEN; ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT; RENAL IMPAIRMENT; VANCOMYCIN; DIARRHEA; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1007/s15010-016-0894-y
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Purpose Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) represents a significant economic healthcare burden, especially the cost of recurrent disease. Fidaxomicin produced significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates in clinical trials. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in Germany in the first-line treatment of patient subgroups with CDI at increased risk of recurrence. Methods A semi-Markov model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin from a payer perspective in Germany. The model cycle length was 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Model inputs were probability of clinical cure, 30-day probability of recurrence, and 30-day attributable mortality based on evidence from two randomized controlled trials comparing fidaxomicin and vancomycin in patients with CDI. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, cost per bed-day saved, and cost per recurrence avoided. Results Despite higher drug acquisition costs, fidaxomicin was dominant in the cancer subgroup (less costly and more effective) and cost-effective in the other subgroups, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vs. vancomycin ranging from (sic)26,900 to (sic)44,500. Hospitalization costs of the first-line treatment of CDI with fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin were lower in every patient subgroup, resulting in budget impacts ranging from -(sic)1325 (in patients >= 65 years) to -(sic)2438 (in cancer patients). Reductions in the cost of treating recurrence with fidaxomicin ranged from -(sic)574.32 per patient in those receiving concomitant antibiotics to -(sic)1500.68 per patient in renally impaired patients. Conclusions In patient subgroups with CDI at increased recurrence risk, fidaxomicin was cost-effective vs. vancomycin, and less costly and more effective in patients with cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Onabotulinumtoxin A as First-Line Treatment for Overactive Bladder
    不详
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (11) : 629 - 630
  • [42] A cost-effectiveness analysis of Onabotulinumtoxin A as first-line treatment for overactive bladder
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    Carter-Brooks, Charelle M.
    Chermanksy, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (08) : 1213 - 1219
  • [43] A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line controller therapies for persistent asthma
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    Borker, Rohit
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (07) : 577 - 590
  • [44] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Controller Therapies for Persistent Asthma
    Ya-Chen Tina Shih
    Josephine Mauskopf
    Rohit Borker
    PharmacoEconomics, 2007, 25 : 577 - 590
  • [45] The Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cryoablation vs First-Line Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Canadian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Andrade, Jason G.
    Moss, Joe W. E.
    Kuniss, Malte
    Sadri, Hamid
    Wazni, Oussama
    Sale, Alicia
    Ismyrloglou, Eleni
    Chierchia, Gian Battista
    Kaplon, Rachelle
    Mealing, Stuart
    Bainbridge, Jamie
    Bromilow, Tom
    Lane, Emily
    Khaykin, Yaariv
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (04) : 576 - 584
  • [46] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CATHETER ABLATION AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT
    Aronsson, M.
    Walfridsson, H.
    Janzon, M.
    Walfridsson, U.
    Levin, L. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A529 - A529
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine as a first-line treatment: A comment
    Basu, Anirban
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (05) : 357 - 357
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Vancomycin for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection
    Varier, Raghu U.
    Biltaji, Eman O.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Roberts, Mark S.
    LaFleur, Joanne
    Nelson, Richard E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S250 - S251
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril as first-line treatment for patients with hypertension: An ALLHAT analysis
    Heidenreich, PA
    Davis, BR
    Furberg, CD
    Lairson, DR
    Pressel, S
    Goldman, L
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 372A - 372A
  • [50] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANT IN TREATING CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE INFECTION IN CANADA
    Zowall, H.
    Brewer, C.
    Deutsch, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A676 - A676