4π Non-Coplanar Liver SBRT: A Novel Delivery Technique

被引:128
|
作者
Dong, Peng [1 ]
Lee, Percy [1 ]
Ruan, Dan [1 ]
Long, Troy [2 ]
Romeijn, Edwin [2 ]
Yang, Yingli [1 ]
Low, Daniel [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick [1 ]
Sheng, Ke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; BEAM ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; PHASE I/II TRIAL; METASTASES; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To improve the quality of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments, a novel 4 pi framework was developed with accompanying algorithms to optimize non-coplanar beam orientations and fluences. The dose optimization is performed on a patient-specific deliverable beam geometry solution space, parameterized with patient and linear accelerator gantry orientations. Methods and Materials: Beams causing collision between the gantry and the couch or patient were eliminated by simulating all beam orientations using a precise computer assisted design model of the linear accelerator and a human subject. Integrated beam orientation and fluence map optimizations were performed on remaining beams using a greedy column generation method. Testing of the new method was performed on 10 liver SBRT cases previously treated with 50 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For each patient, both 14 and 22 non-coplanar fields were selected and optimized to meet the objective of >= 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) covered by 100% of the prescription dose. Doses to organs at risk, normal liver volumes receiving <15 Gy, integral dose, and 50% dose spillage volumes were compared against the delivered clinical VMAT plans. Results: Compared with the VMAT plans, the 4 pi plans yielded reduced 50% dose spillage volume and integral dose by 22% (range 10%-40%) and 19% (range 13%-26%), respectively. The mean normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy was increased by 51 cc (range 21-107 cc) with a 31% reduction of the mean normal liver dose. Mean doses to the left kidney and right kidney and maximum doses to the stomach and spinal cord were on average reduced by 70%, 51%, 67%, and 64% (P <=.05). Conclusions: This novel 4p non-coplanar radiation delivery technique significantly improved dose gradient, reduced high dose spillage, and improved organ at risk sparing compared with state of the art VMAT plans. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1360 / 1366
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-Coplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison with Coplanar VMAT, IMRT and CyberKnife
    Zhang, S.
    Yang, R.
    Shi, C.
    Li, J.
    Zhuang, H.
    Tian, S.
    Wang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E358 - E358
  • [42] Beam Selection for 4Pi Non-Coplanar Converging (4PiNC) Delivery Using a Genetic Algorithm (GA)
    Cho, D.
    Wang, S.
    Sabbas, A.
    Chao, K.
    Chang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [43] 4π Non-Coplanar Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Head and Neck Cancer: Potential to Improve Local Control and Late Toxicity
    Rwigema, J.
    Nguyen, D.
    Heron, D.
    Chen, A. M.
    Lee, P.
    Vargo, J. A.
    Low, D.
    Huq, M.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Kupelian, P.
    Sheng, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S556 - S557
  • [44] Integral Dose Study of Non-Coplanar 4pi Radiotherapy
    Nguyen, D.
    Dong, P.
    Ruan, D.
    Low, D.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [45] Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using a coplanar versus a non-coplanar beam technique: a comparison of clinical outcomes
    Hallemeier, Christopher L.
    Stauder, Michael C.
    Miller, Robert C.
    Garces, Yolanda I.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Sarkaria, Jann N.
    Bauer, Heather J.
    Mayo, Charles S.
    Olivier, Kenneth R.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2013, 2 (03): : 225 - 233
  • [46] Enhanced prostate SBRT using VMAT plus a single computer-optimized non-coplanar IMRT beam
    Sharfo, A. W.
    Rossi, L.
    Dirkx, M. L. P.
    Aluwini, S.
    Breedveld, S.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S497 - S497
  • [47] Development of a beam angle class solution to replace full beam angle optimization in non-coplanar prostate SBRT
    Rossi, L.
    Breedveld, S.
    Aluwini, S.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S67 - S68
  • [48] SBRT for Spine Lesions: A Novel Optimized Delivery Technique
    Papanikolaou, P.
    Saenz, D.
    Kirby, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    Rasmussen, K.
    Crownover, R. L.
    Floyd, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E353 - E353
  • [49] On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT
    Rossi, Linda
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Voet, Peter W. J.
    Lanconelli, Nico
    Aluwini, Shafak
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (17): : 5441 - 5458
  • [50] Determining the Preliminary Orbit in the Non-Coplanar Case
    V. B. Kuznetsov
    Solar System Research, 2022, 56 : 195 - 205