4π Non-Coplanar Liver SBRT: A Novel Delivery Technique

被引:128
|
作者
Dong, Peng [1 ]
Lee, Percy [1 ]
Ruan, Dan [1 ]
Long, Troy [2 ]
Romeijn, Edwin [2 ]
Yang, Yingli [1 ]
Low, Daniel [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick [1 ]
Sheng, Ke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; BEAM ANGLE OPTIMIZATION; PHASE I/II TRIAL; METASTASES; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To improve the quality of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments, a novel 4 pi framework was developed with accompanying algorithms to optimize non-coplanar beam orientations and fluences. The dose optimization is performed on a patient-specific deliverable beam geometry solution space, parameterized with patient and linear accelerator gantry orientations. Methods and Materials: Beams causing collision between the gantry and the couch or patient were eliminated by simulating all beam orientations using a precise computer assisted design model of the linear accelerator and a human subject. Integrated beam orientation and fluence map optimizations were performed on remaining beams using a greedy column generation method. Testing of the new method was performed on 10 liver SBRT cases previously treated with 50 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For each patient, both 14 and 22 non-coplanar fields were selected and optimized to meet the objective of >= 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) covered by 100% of the prescription dose. Doses to organs at risk, normal liver volumes receiving <15 Gy, integral dose, and 50% dose spillage volumes were compared against the delivered clinical VMAT plans. Results: Compared with the VMAT plans, the 4 pi plans yielded reduced 50% dose spillage volume and integral dose by 22% (range 10%-40%) and 19% (range 13%-26%), respectively. The mean normal liver volume receiving <15 Gy was increased by 51 cc (range 21-107 cc) with a 31% reduction of the mean normal liver dose. Mean doses to the left kidney and right kidney and maximum doses to the stomach and spinal cord were on average reduced by 70%, 51%, 67%, and 64% (P <=.05). Conclusions: This novel 4p non-coplanar radiation delivery technique significantly improved dose gradient, reduced high dose spillage, and improved organ at risk sparing compared with state of the art VMAT plans. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1360 / 1366
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coplanar and non-coplanar plan optimization in prostate SBRT
    Rossi, L.
    Breedveld, S.
    Al-Uwini, S.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S176 - S177
  • [2] VMAT plus few optimized non-coplanar IMRT beams is equivalent to multi-beam non-coplanar liver SBRT
    Sharfo, A. W. M.
    Dirkx, M. L. P.
    Breedveld, S.
    Romero, A. M. Mendez
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S122 - S123
  • [3] 4π Non-Coplanar SBRT for Centrally Located or Larger Lung Tumors
    Sheng, K.
    Dong, P.
    Lee, P.
    Ruan, D.
    Long, T.
    Romeijin, E.
    Low, D.
    Kupelian, P.
    Yang, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S122 - S122
  • [4] Single Segment Non-coplanar Beam Optimization for Gated Lung SBRT Planning and Delivery
    Partouche, J.
    Wu, T.
    Farrey, K.
    Salama, J. K.
    Yenice, K. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S672 - S673
  • [5] Computer optimized non-coplanar beam set-ups for SBRT of liver tumors
    de Pooter, J.
    Romero, A. Mendez
    Jansen, W. P. A.
    Storchi, P. R. M.
    Woudstra, E.
    Levendag, P. C.
    Heijmen, B. J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S125 - S125
  • [6] Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis
    de Pooter, Jacco A.
    Romero, Alejandra Mendez
    Wunderink, Wouter
    Storchi, Pascal R. M.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 (03) : 376 - 381
  • [7] Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimisation improves IMRT in SBRT of liver tumours
    Pooter, J.
    Romero, A. Mendez
    Storchi, P.
    Woudstra, E.
    Heijmen, B.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S29 - S29
  • [8] 4π Non-coplanar Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Sarkar, Biplab
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 101 (03): : 741 - 742
  • [9] Coplanar and non-coplanar VMAT facilitate OAR dose sparing in central lung SBRT
    Thomsen, J. B.
    Persson, G. F.
    Aznar, M. C.
    Berthelsen, A. K.
    Specht, L.
    Josipovic, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1021 - S1021
  • [10] Impact of the dose outside the PTV on distant recurrence in coplanar and non-coplanar lung SBRT
    Heng, V. J.
    Diamant, A.
    Chatterjee, A.
    Faria, S.
    Bahig, H.
    Filion, E.
    Doucet, R.
    El Naqa, I.
    Seuntjens, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S531 - S531