共 50 条
Comparison of a Stable Isotope-Labeled and an Analog Internal Standard for the Quantification of Everolimus by a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method
被引:12
|作者:
Heideloff, Courtney
[1
]
Payto, Drew
[1
]
Wang, Sihe
[1
]
机构:
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Clin Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词:
everolimus;
everolimus-d4;
32-desmethoxyrapamycin;
LC-MS/MS;
FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY;
LC-MS/MS METHOD;
WHOLE-BLOOD;
ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION;
CYCLOSPORINE-A;
SIROLIMUS;
TACROLIMUS;
PERFORMANCE;
PITFALLS;
D O I:
10.1097/FTD.0b013e318283403e
中图分类号:
R446 [实验室诊断];
R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Background: Everolimus is an immunosuppressant drug used in solid organ transplantation. Immunoassays and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods have been used for therapeutic drug monitoring of this drug. In LC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods, both 32-desmethoxyrapamycin and everolimus-d4 have been used as internal standards. Objectives: To compare 2 internal standards (32-desmethoxyrapamycin and everolimus-d4) for the quantification of everolimus by an LC-MS/MS method. Methods: Both 32-desmethoxyrapamycin and everolimus-d4 were introduced in the method validation process with 2 transitions simultaneously monitored for everolimus (975.6 -> 908.7 as the quantifier and 975.6 -> 926.9 as the qualifier) by an established LC-MS/MS method. The key performance characteristics were lower limit of quantification, accuracy, precision, and comparison with an LC-MS/MS method offered by another laboratory. Results: The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 1.0 ng/mL using either internal standard with an analytical recovery of 98.3%-108.1% across the linear range. The total coefficient of variation for everolimus was 4.3%-7.2% with no significant difference between the 2 internal standards. In comparison with an independent LC-MS/MS method, though everolimus-d4 offered a better slope (0.95 versus 0.83), both internal standards showed acceptable results and had a coefficient of correlation r > 0.98 in the tested concentration range of 1.2-12.7 ng/mL. Conclusions: Although everolimus-d4 offered a more favorable comparison with an independent LC-MS/MS method, both everolimus-d4 and 32-desmethoxyrapamycin had acceptable performance as the internal standards for everolimus quantification by the LC-MS/MS method.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 250
页数:5
相关论文