Validation of the EORTC QLQ-GINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours

被引:86
|
作者
Yadegarfar, G. [1 ,2 ]
Friend, L. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, L. [3 ]
Plum, L. M. [4 ]
Ardill, J. [5 ]
Taal, B. [6 ]
Larsson, G. [7 ]
Jeziorski, K. [8 ]
Kwekkeboom, D. [9 ]
Ramage, J. K. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, London, England
[2] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Kermanshah, Iran
[3] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Neuroendocrine Tumour Serv, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
[4] Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Royal Victoria Hosp, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Uppsala Univ, Dept Endocrine Oncol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Mem Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[9] Erasmus Univ, Dept Nucl Med, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[10] Kings Coll Hosp London, Neuroendocrine Tumour Serv, Inst Liver Studies, London SE5 9RS, England
[11] Basingstoke & N Hampshire Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, Hants, England
关键词
neuroendocrine; carcinoid; quality of life; patient-reported outcome measure; CARCINOID-TUMORS; LIVER METASTASES; SURVIVAL; MIDGUT; LANREOTIDE; PROGNOSIS; TRENDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.560
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Quality of life is an important end point in clinical trials, yet there are few quality of life questionnaires for neuroendocrine tumours. Methods: This international multicentre validation study assesses the QLQ-GINET21 Quality of Life Questionnaire in 253 patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. All patients were requested to complete two quality of life questionnaires - the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-GINET21 - at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months post-baseline; the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were then analysed. Results: Analysis of QLQ-GINET21 scales confirmed appropriate aggregation of the items, except for treatment-related symptoms, where weight gain showed low correlation with other questions in the scale; weight gain was therefore analysed as a single item. Internal consistency of scales using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.7 for all parts of the QLQ-GINET21 at 6 months. Intraclass correlation was >0.85 for all scales. Discriminant validity was confirmed, with values <0.70 for all scales compared with each other. Scores changed in accordance with alterations in performance status and in response to expected clinical changes after therapies. Mean scores were similar for pancreatic and other tumours. Conclusion: The QLQ-GINET21 is a valid and responsive tool for assessing quality of life in the gut, pancreas and liver neuroendocrine tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer-introducing the new EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 29 module
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Hjermstad, Marianne J.
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof
    Harle, Amelie
    Arraras, Juan I.
    Morag, Ofir
    Pompili, Cecilia
    Ioannidis, Georgios
    Georgiou, Loukia
    Georgiou, Morfo
    Navarra, Chiara
    Chie, Wei-Chu
    Johnson, Colin
    Himpel, Ayje
    Schulz, Christian
    Hofmann, Hans-Stefan
    Kulis, Dagmara
    Koller, Michael
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 72 - 73
  • [42] International development of an EORTC questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: the EORTC QLQ-CML24
    Fabio Efficace
    Michele Baccarani
    Massimo Breccia
    Susanne Saussele
    Gregory Abel
    Giovanni Caocci
    Francois Guilhot
    Kim Cocks
    Adel Naeem
    Mirjam Sprangers
    Simone Oerlemans
    Weichu Chie
    Fausto Castagnetti
    Felice Bombaci
    Giora Sharf
    Annarita Cardoni
    Lucien Noens
    Stephan Pallua
    Marzia Salvucci
    Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis
    Gianantonio Rosti
    Franco Mandelli
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 825 - 836
  • [43] The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients
    Ignacio Arraras, Juan
    Manterola, Ana
    Hernandez, Berta
    Arias de la Vega, Fernando
    Martinez, Maite
    Vila, Meritxell
    Eito, Clara
    Vera, Ruth
    Angel Dominguez, Miguel
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (06): : 401 - 410
  • [44] Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer
    Blazeby, JM
    Conroy, T
    Bottomley, A
    Vickery, C
    Arraras, J
    Sezer, O
    Moore, J
    Koller, M
    Turhal, NS
    Stuart, R
    van Cutsem, E
    D'haese, S
    Coens, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (15) : 2260 - 2268
  • [45] Validation of the EORTC QLQ-CAX24, a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire for cancer patients with cachexia
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Madechangu, Chiedza
    Hopkinson, Jane
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Bahar, Iqbal
    Balstad, Trude R.
    Baracos, Vickie
    Bredart, Anne
    Silva, Joaquim Castro
    Correia, Isabel
    de Castro, Gilberto
    Gioulbasanis, Ioannis
    Hammerlid, Eva
    Ishiki, Hiroto
    Naito, Tateaki
    Pinto, Monica
    Routledge, Jacki
    Schmidt, Heike
    Singer, Susanne
    Solheim, Tora
    Strasser, Florian
    Tomaszewski, Iwona
    Yim, Kein
    Young, Teresa
    Johson, Colin
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 16 - 17
  • [46] The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients
    Juan Ignacio Arraras
    Ana Manterola
    Berta Hernández
    Fernando Arias de la Vega
    Maite Martínez
    Meritxell Vila
    Clara Eito
    Ruth Vera
    Miguel Ángel Domínguez
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2011, 13 : 401 - 410
  • [47] An international update of the EORTC questionnaire for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients: EORTC QLQ-BR45 (vol 31, pg 283, 2020)
    Bjelic-Radisic, V.
    Cardoso, F.
    Cameron, D.
    Brain, E.
    Kuljanic, K.
    da Costa, R. A.
    Conroy, T.
    Inwald, E. C.
    Serpentini, S.
    Pinto, M.
    Weis, J.
    Morag, O.
    Astrup, G. Lindviksmoen
    Tomaszewski, K. A.
    Pogoda, K.
    Sinai, P.
    Sprangers, M.
    Aaronson, N.
    Velikova, G.
    Greimel, E.
    Arraras, J.
    Bottomley, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 552 - 552
  • [48] Comparison of Quality of Life Measurement Tools, EORTC GINET21 and ESAS-r, in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Considerations for Clinical Implementation
    Saravana-Bawan, Bianka
    Wieler, Marguerite
    McMullen, Todd
    McEwan, Alexander
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (03) : 450 - 451
  • [49] Evaluating the readability of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30
    Kulis, Dagmara
    Stone, Anne
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    Bottomley, Andrew
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S177 - S178
  • [50] The EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3.0) Quality of Life questionnaire:: Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients
    Arraras, JI
    Arias, F
    Tejedor, M
    Pruja, E
    Marcos, M
    Martínez, E
    Valerdi, J
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2002, 11 (03) : 249 - 256