Models of Single-Well Push-Pull Test With Mixing Effect in the Wellbore

被引:25
|
作者
Wang, Quanrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shi, Wenguang [2 ]
Zhan, Hongbin [3 ]
Gu, Haochen [2 ]
Chen, Kewei [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, State Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Radial dispersion; Parameter estimation; Solute transport; Modeling; DIMENSIONAL SOLUTE TRANSPORT; FLOW TRACER TESTS; BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; DISPERSION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1029/2018WR023317
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The mechanism of solute transport around the wellbore was found to play an important role in the single-well push-pull (SWPP) test, but it was grossly overlooked in previous studies. For instance, the mixing effect of injected tracer with water in the wellbore was ignored in analyzing both injection and extraction phases of SWPP. In this study, new models were developed by including such a mixing effect in the wellbore. Two types of boundary conditions at the wellbore were considered: the resident concentration continuity and the flux concentration continuity. To test the assumptions used in the mathematical model, the stochastic modeling, the numerical simulation, and the laboratory-controlled experiment were executed. Results showed that the SWPP test was sensitive to the mixing effect in both injection and extraction phases. A larger wellbore volume could result in a smaller concentration at the late stage of the extraction phase. Flux concentration continuity was more reasonable in describing solute transport at the wellbore-aquifer interface than resident concentration continuity, and the difference between them decreased with decreasing radial dispersivity. The MODFLOW/MT3DMS package contained an invalid assumption on the mixing effect for the SWPP test. Stochastic modeling demonstrated that the homogeneous assumption was a good approximation for the reality when the variance of natural logarithm of the autocorrelated hydraulic conductivity field was less than 0.25 ( sigma lnK20.25). The laboratory-controlled experiment showed that the radial advection-dispersion equation model of this study worked well for the well-sorted sand aquifer.
引用
收藏
页码:10155 / 10171
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fractional Models Simulating Non-Fickian Behavior in Four-Stage Single-Well Push-Pull Tests
    Chen, Kewei
    Zhan, Hongbin
    Yang, Qiang
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (11) : 9528 - 9545
  • [22] On the Loss of Injectant and Apparent Dispersivity in Single-Well Push-Pull Tests Influenced by Natural Drift
    Sverre G. Johnsen
    Curtis H. Whitson
    Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 86 : 475 - 478
  • [23] On the Loss of Injectant and Apparent Dispersivity in Single-Well Push-Pull Tests Influenced by Natural Drift
    Johnsen, Sverre G.
    Whitson, Curtis H.
    TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2011, 86 (02) : 505 - 508
  • [24] A modified and rapid method for the single-well push-pull (SWPP) test using SF6, Kr, and uranine tracers
    Joun, Won-Tak
    Lee, Kang-Kun
    Ha, Seung-Wook
    Lee, Seong-Sun
    Kim, Yeji
    Do, Hyun-Kwon
    Jun, Seong-Chun
    Kim, YongCheol
    Ju, YeoJin
    WATER RESEARCH, 2023, 236
  • [25] A multi-species reactive transport model to estimate biogeochemical rates based on single-well push-pull test data
    Phanikumar, Mantha S.
    McGuire, Jennifer T.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2010, 36 (08) : 997 - 1004
  • [26] A new solution to transient single-well push-pull test with low-permeability non-Darcian leakage effects
    Zhu, Qi
    Wen, Zhang
    Jakada, Hamza
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2020, 234
  • [27] Use of single-well push-pull tracer tests to simulate a dynamic saltwater-freshwater interface
    Hebig, K. H.
    Ito, N.
    Tecklenburg, J.
    Machida, I.
    Marui, A.
    Scheytt, T.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (04) : 1 - 16
  • [28] Laboratory investigation of surfactant-enhanced trichloroethene solubilization using single-well, "push-pull" tests
    Field, JA
    Istok, JD
    Schroth, MH
    Sawyer, TE
    Humphrey, MD
    GROUND WATER, 1999, 37 (04) : 581 - 588
  • [29] Numerical simulation of single-well push-pull tests in a radial two-zone confined aquifer
    Li, Xu
    Wen, Zhang
    Zhu, Qi
    Hamza, Jakada
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 27 (07) : 2645 - 2658
  • [30] Single-well push-pull tests evaluating isobutane as a primary substrate for promoting in situ cometabolic biotransformation reactions
    Rolston, Hannah
    Hyman, Michael
    Semprini, Lewis
    BIODEGRADATION, 2022, 33 (04) : 349 - 371