The Bifactor Model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

被引:25
|
作者
Kobor, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Takacs, Adam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Urban, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Doctoral Sch Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Inst Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Cognit Neurosci & Psychol, Res Ctr Nat Sci, H-1068 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
behavioral problems; bifactor structure; parent and teacher report; screening; Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; SELF-REPORTED SDQ; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADHD SUBTYPES; DISORDERS; ALPHA; CHILD;
D O I
10.1027/1015-5759/a000160
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a frequently used instrument developed for screening childhood mental health problems. The aim of this study is to clarify the structure of the Hungarian version of SDQ, to test previous measurement models, and to propose an alternative bifactor model. Data were collected from a community sample of 8-13-year-old children. We conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses on parent (n = 383) and teacher ratings (n = 391). The classic five-factor, an alternative three-factor, and a bifactor model were estimated. In the bifactor model, specific components refer to the five SDQ-traits, and the General Problems factor refers to an impression about the problem severity of the child. For both informants, the bifactor model yielded the best fit to the data compared to other models. Childhood behavioral problems can be best described as a multidimensional construct, which has implications regarding the screening procedure in various samples.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linking the Child Behavior Checklist to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Mansolf, Maxwell
    Blackwell, Courtney K.
    Cummings, Peter
    Choi, Seohyun
    Cella, David
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [22] Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire"
    Smedje, H
    Broman, JE
    Hetta, J
    von Knorring, AL
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 8 (02) : 63 - 70
  • [23] Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Arman, Soroor
    Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi
    Maracy, Mohamad Reza
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 18 (06): : 501 - 505
  • [24] A Comparison of Paper and Computer Administered Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Praveetha Patalay
    Daniel Hayes
    Jessica Deighton
    Miranda Wolpert
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2016, 38 : 242 - 250
  • [25] Interparent Agreement on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Chinese Study
    Mellor, David
    Wong, Jessica
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 40 (06): : 890 - 896
  • [26] Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire”
    H. Smedje
    J.-E. Broman
    J. Hetta
    A.-L. von Knorring
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1999, 8 : 63 - 70
  • [27] An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Hill, Crystal R.
    Hughes, Jan N.
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2007, 22 (03) : 380 - 406
  • [28] Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Hawes, DJ
    Dadds, MR
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 38 (08): : 644 - 651
  • [29] Finnish norms for young children on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Borg, Anne-Mari
    Kaukonen, Palvi
    Joukamaa, Matti
    Tamminen, Tuula
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 68 (07) : 433 - 442
  • [30] A Comparison of Paper and Computer Administered Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Patalay, Praveetha
    Hayes, Daniel
    Deighton, Jessica
    Wolpert, Miranda
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 38 (02) : 242 - 250