Social Preferences for Orphan Drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among the French General Population

被引:13
|
作者
Toumi, Mondher [1 ,2 ]
Millier, Aurelie [1 ]
Cristeau, Olivier [1 ]
Thokagevistk-Desroziers, Katia [1 ]
Dorey, Julie [1 ]
Aballea, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Creativ eutical, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Paris, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Publ Hlth Dept, Res Unit EA 3279, Marseille, France
关键词
orphan drugs; rare disease; social value; equity; discrete choice experiment; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2020.00323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives:While several authors have suggested using a multi-criteria approach for orphan drug assessment and proposed lists of determinants of orphan drug value, studies on social preferences regarding these determinants remain limited. The current study aimed to identify preferences of the French general population regarding attributes characterizing the value of orphan drugs in a discrete choice experiment. Methods:The list of attributes was formed based on a literature search and was refined through expert interviews, a focus group, and a pilot study. The final list included nine attributes: disease-associated disability, disease-associated mortality, number of patients, availability of alternative treatments, treatment impact on disease disability, treatment impact on mortality, treatment safety, uncertainty around therapeutic effect, and annual treatment cost per patient. Members of the General Public were presented with 12 choice sets containing two drug profiles described according to the attributes and an option to fund neither of these treatments. The questionnaire was disseminated online. A conditional logit model with random effects was used to estimate the weight of each attribute. Results:A total of 958 persons participated in the study (48.7% male, mean age: 47.5 years). All attributes except for disease-associated disability had a statistically significant influence on the choices made by participants. The attribute with the highest weight was treatment impact on mortality (p< 0.0001), followed by uncertainty around therapeutic effect (p< 0.0001). The direction of results was generally consistent with intuition: patients preferred a drug with a larger impact on mortality, a larger impact on disability, with mild or no adverse events, with less uncertainty. Although patients appeared to prefer drugs with a lower budget impact, the relationship between patient preferences and costs was more complex. Conclusions:Preferences of the general public between orphan drugs are mostly driven by the impact on mortality and the degree of certainty regarding the available evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PERSISTENCE WITH MEDICATIONS: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT OF PREFERENCES AMONG HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    Fargher, E. A.
    Morrison, V
    Plumpton, C. O.
    Hughes, D. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A532 - A532
  • [32] Treatment preferences of originator versus biosimilar drugs in Crohn's disease; discrete choice experiment among gastroenterologists
    Baji, Petra
    Gulacsi, Laszlo
    Lovasz, Barbara D.
    Golovics, Petra A.
    Brodszky, Valentin
    Pentek, Marta
    Rencz, Fanni
    Lakatos, Peter L.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 51 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [33] Intensive care doctors and nurses personal preferences for Intensive Care, as compared to the general population: a discrete choice experiment
    Matthew H. Anstey
    Imogen A. Mitchell
    Charlie Corke
    Lauren Murray
    Marion Mitchell
    Andrew Udy
    Vineet Sarode
    Nhi Nguyen
    Oliver Flower
    Kwok M. Ho
    Edward Litton
    Bradley Wibrow
    Richard Norman
    Critical Care, 25
  • [34] Patient and General Population Preferences Regarding the Benefits and Harms of Treatment for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Menges, Dominik
    Piatti, Michela C.
    Omlin, Aurelius
    Cathomas, Richard
    Benamran, Daniel
    Fischer, Stefanie
    Iselin, Christophe
    Kung, Marc
    Lorch, Anja
    Prause, Lukas
    Rothermundt, Christian
    Stern, Alix O'Meara
    Zihler, Deborah
    Lippuner, Max
    Braun, Julia
    Cerny, Thomas
    Puhan, Milo A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 51 : 26 - 38
  • [35] Intensive care doctors and nurses personal preferences for Intensive Care, as compared to the general population: a discrete choice experiment
    Anstey, Matthew H.
    Mitchell, Imogen A.
    Corke, Charlie
    Murray, Lauren
    Mitchell, Marion
    Udy, Andrew
    Sarode, Vineet
    Nguyen, Nhi
    Flower, Oliver
    Ho, Kwok M.
    Litton, Edward
    Wibrow, Bradley
    Norman, Richard
    CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [36] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M.
    Atherly, Adam J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2020, 26 (07): : E219 - +
  • [37] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
    Atherly, Adam
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01): : 142 - 142
  • [38] Comparison of Equity Preferences for Life Expectancy Gains: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among the Japanese and Korean General Public
    Goto, Rei
    Mori, Takeshi
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2019, 18 : 8 - 13
  • [39] Population preferences for breast cancer screening policies: Discrete choice experiment in Belarus
    Mandrik, Olena
    Yaumenenka, Alesya
    Herrero, Rolando
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [40] DESIGN OF A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT FOR PREFERENCES ELICITATION OF ELDERLY POPULATION TOWARDS DEPRESSION
    Monteiro, A. L.
    Santos, M. S.
    Cintra, M. A. C. T.
    Pereira, C. C.
    Floriano, D. B.
    Plotkowski, L. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A197 - A197