Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges

被引:221
|
作者
Geist, Juergen [1 ]
Hawkins, Stephen J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Aquat Syst Biol Unit, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Southampton, Natl Oceanog Ctr, Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Marine Biol Assoc UK, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
biodiversity conservation; closed system; ecosystem engineer; ecosystem functioning; habitat structure; keystone species; rehabilitation; restoration success; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; STREAM RESTORATION; SHALLOW LAKES; COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE; POSITIVE INTERACTIONS; MICROBIAL PROPERTIES; RIVER RESTORATION; PLANT-COMMUNITIES; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; ECOLOGICAL VALUE;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2702
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. Aquatic ecosystems are degraded by a variety of pressures as a result of the growing human population. Global-scale impacts include homogenization of biological communities, removal of top predators and ecosystem engineers, chemical pollution by excess nutrients and contaminants as well as deteriorating structural diversity, connectivity and process dynamics. There is a pressing societal need to reverse the decline in biodiversity and replace lost ecosystem functioning and services in aquatic ecosystems by enabling natural recovery or by active restoration. 2. Common concepts and approaches for conservation, recovery and restoration in freshwater and marine ecosystems, aided by recent advances in ecological theory, include decision criteria on priorities for conservation, harnessing natural recovery by cessation of impacts, restoring connectivity and meso-habitat diversity as well as the geomorphological structural template including hydrodynamic processes. Re-oligotrophication at catchment or regional sea-scale benefits from integrating freshwater and marine restoration. Species or assemblages that convey biogenic structure or act as ecosystem engineers and keystone species should be given priority. Top-down control can be reinstated in closed systems. 3. Differences between freshwater and marine ecosystems include the greater spatial restriction of many species in fresh water, the importance of rooted vegetation and insects in freshwater, and the much greater dispersal and connectivity in marine systems. These differences dictate different approaches, with more scope for active restoration work in fresh water and harnessing natural recovery in marine systems. 4. Restoration schemes need clearly defined target states. They should generally take a process-oriented and stepwise adaptive management approach judging success against reference or control sites. Societal and political expectations need to be managed and restoration schemes should not promise too much. Even minor rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems can put back some biodiversity and key services. Sometimes 'Ersatz'-ecosystems are better than nothing and the best that can be achieved, especially in urban settings. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 962
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Special issue on restoration of aquatic ecosystems Foreword
    Quinn, John M.
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (03) : 653 - 657
  • [22] Predicting and Assessing Progress in the Restoration of Ecosystems
    Sinclair, A. R. E.
    Pech, Roger P.
    Fryxell, John M.
    McCann, Kevin
    Byrom, Andrea E.
    Savory, C. John
    Brashares, Justin
    Arthur, Anthony D.
    Catling, Peter C.
    Triska, Maggie D.
    Craig, Michael D.
    Sinclair, Tim J. E.
    McLaren, Jennie R.
    Turkington, Roy
    Beyers, Rene L.
    Harrower, William L.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2018, 11 (02):
  • [23] TinyML: Current Progress, Research Challenges, and Future Roadmap
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Theocharides, Theocharis
    Reddy, Vijay Janapa
    Murmann, Boris
    2021 58TH ACM/IEEE DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE (DAC), 2021, : 1303 - 1306
  • [24] Current progress, challenges, and future prospects of testis organoids
    Cham, Tat-Chuan
    Chen, Xiongbiao
    Honaramooz, Ali
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2021, 104 (05) : 942 - 961
  • [25] Ecological restoration of aquatic and semi-aquatic ecosystems in the Netherlands: an introduction
    Nienhuis, PH
    Gulati, RD
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2002, 478 (1-3) : 1 - 6
  • [26] Ecological restoration of aquatic and semi-aquatic ecosystems in the Netherlands: an introduction*
    P.H. Nienhuis
    R.D. Gulati
    Hydrobiologia, 2002, 478 : 1 - 6
  • [27] Preface: Restoration of eutrophic lakes: current practices and future challenges
    Jilbert, Tom
    Couture, Raoul-Marie
    Huser, Brian J.
    Salonen, Kalevi
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2020, 847 (21) : 4343 - 4357
  • [28] Preface: Restoration of eutrophic lakes: current practices and future challenges
    Tom Jilbert
    Raoul-Marie Couture
    Brian J. Huser
    Kalevi Salonen
    Hydrobiologia, 2020, 847 : 4343 - 4357
  • [29] Photocatalytic NOx removal and recovery: progress, challenges and future perspectives
    Xue, Ting
    Li, Jing
    Chen, Lvcun
    Li, Kanglu
    Hua, Ying
    Yang, Yan
    Dong, Fan
    CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 15 (24) : 9026 - 9046
  • [30] Plant invasions into mountains and alpine ecosystems: current status and future challenges
    Jake M. Alexander
    Jonas J. Lembrechts
    Lohengrin A. Cavieres
    Curtis Daehler
    Sylvia Haider
    Christoph Kueffer
    Gang Liu
    Keith McDougall
    Ann Milbau
    Aníbal Pauchard
    Lisa J. Rew
    Tim Seipel
    Alpine Botany, 2016, 126 : 89 - 103