Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges

被引:221
|
作者
Geist, Juergen [1 ]
Hawkins, Stephen J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Aquat Syst Biol Unit, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Southampton, Natl Oceanog Ctr, Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Marine Biol Assoc UK, Plymouth, Devon, England
关键词
biodiversity conservation; closed system; ecosystem engineer; ecosystem functioning; habitat structure; keystone species; rehabilitation; restoration success; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; STREAM RESTORATION; SHALLOW LAKES; COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE; POSITIVE INTERACTIONS; MICROBIAL PROPERTIES; RIVER RESTORATION; PLANT-COMMUNITIES; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; ECOLOGICAL VALUE;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2702
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
1. Aquatic ecosystems are degraded by a variety of pressures as a result of the growing human population. Global-scale impacts include homogenization of biological communities, removal of top predators and ecosystem engineers, chemical pollution by excess nutrients and contaminants as well as deteriorating structural diversity, connectivity and process dynamics. There is a pressing societal need to reverse the decline in biodiversity and replace lost ecosystem functioning and services in aquatic ecosystems by enabling natural recovery or by active restoration. 2. Common concepts and approaches for conservation, recovery and restoration in freshwater and marine ecosystems, aided by recent advances in ecological theory, include decision criteria on priorities for conservation, harnessing natural recovery by cessation of impacts, restoring connectivity and meso-habitat diversity as well as the geomorphological structural template including hydrodynamic processes. Re-oligotrophication at catchment or regional sea-scale benefits from integrating freshwater and marine restoration. Species or assemblages that convey biogenic structure or act as ecosystem engineers and keystone species should be given priority. Top-down control can be reinstated in closed systems. 3. Differences between freshwater and marine ecosystems include the greater spatial restriction of many species in fresh water, the importance of rooted vegetation and insects in freshwater, and the much greater dispersal and connectivity in marine systems. These differences dictate different approaches, with more scope for active restoration work in fresh water and harnessing natural recovery in marine systems. 4. Restoration schemes need clearly defined target states. They should generally take a process-oriented and stepwise adaptive management approach judging success against reference or control sites. Societal and political expectations need to be managed and restoration schemes should not promise too much. Even minor rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems can put back some biodiversity and key services. Sometimes 'Ersatz'-ecosystems are better than nothing and the best that can be achieved, especially in urban settings. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 962
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges
    Staehr, Peter A.
    Testa, Jeremy M.
    Kemp, W. Michael
    Cole, Jon J.
    Sand-Jensen, Kaj
    Smith, Stephen V.
    AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2012, 74 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [2] Microplastic Pollutants in Aquatic Ecosystems: Present and Future Challenges
    Kumar, Amit
    Krishan, Gopal
    WATER, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [3] The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges
    Peter A. Staehr
    Jeremy M. Testa
    W. Michael Kemp
    Jon J. Cole
    Kaj Sand-Jensen
    Stephen V. Smith
    Aquatic Sciences, 2012, 74 : 15 - 29
  • [4] Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions
    O'Hare, Matthew T.
    Aguiar, Francisca C.
    Asaeda, Takashi
    Bakker, Elisabeth S.
    Chambers, Patricia A.
    Clayton, John S.
    Elger, Arnaud
    Ferreira, Teresa M.
    Gross, Elisabeth M.
    Gunn, Iain D. M.
    Gurnell, Angela M.
    Hellsten, Seppo
    Hofstra, Deborah E.
    Li, Wei
    Mohr, Silvia
    Puijalon, Sara
    Szoszkiewicz, Krzysztof
    Willby, Nigel J.
    Wood, Kevin A.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2018, 812 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [5] Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions
    Matthew T. O’Hare
    Francisca C. Aguiar
    Takashi Asaeda
    Elisabeth S. Bakker
    Patricia A. Chambers
    John S. Clayton
    Arnaud Elger
    Teresa M. Ferreira
    Elisabeth M. Gross
    Iain D. M. Gunn
    Angela M. Gurnell
    Seppo Hellsten
    Deborah E. Hofstra
    Wei Li
    Silvia Mohr
    Sara Puijalon
    Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz
    Nigel J. Willby
    Kevin A. Wood
    Hydrobiologia, 2018, 812 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Recovery: Past progress and future challenges
    Slade, Mike
    Adams, Neal
    O'Hagan, Mary
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 24 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [7] Role of Biofilms in Contaminant Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer in Aquatic Ecosystems: Current State of Knowledge and Future Challenges
    Bonnineau, Chloe
    Artigas, Joan
    Chaumet, Betty
    Dabrin, Aymeric
    Fabure, Juliette
    Ferrari, Benoit J. D.
    Lebrun, Jeremie D.
    Margoum, Christelle
    Mazzella, Nicolas
    Miege, Cecile
    Morin, Soizic
    Uher, Emmanuelle
    Babut, Marc
    Pesce, Stephane
    REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL 253, 2021, 253 : 115 - 153
  • [8] Ecological-environmental challenges and restoration of aquatic ecosystems of the Middle-Eastern
    Ahmad Reza Pirali zefrehei
    Mahdi Kolahi
    Judith Fisher
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [9] Ecological-environmental challenges and restoration of aquatic ecosystems of the Middle-Eastern
    Piralizefrehei, Ahmadreza
    Kolahi, Mahdi
    Fisher, Judith
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [10] Quantifying habitat complexity in aquatic ecosystems
    Shumway, Carcily A.
    Hofmann, Hans A.
    Dobberfuhl, Adam P.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (06) : 1065 - 1076