Non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy use in children without primary lung pathology: A prospective observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Browde, K. [1 ]
Morrow, B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Paediat & Child Hlth, Fac Hlth Sci, Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL CHILDREN; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS; FAILURE; TRIAL; NIV;
D O I
10.7196/SAJCH.2019.v13i2.1572
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background. Non-invasive nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) are non-invasive ventilation (NIV) modalities appropriate for children in developing countries. There is minimal literature describing nCPAP and HFNC use in children with respiratory compromise secondary to non-pulmonary disease. Objectives. Th present study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of children without primary lung pathology, who received nCPAP and HFNC during their admission to Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Methods. This was a prospective observational study of routinely collected data, between August 2015 and January 2016. Primary and secondary outcome measures were NIV failure (progression to intubation and invasive ventilation) and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, respectively. Comparative statistics were conducted using Mann-Whitney U or t-tests. Data significantly associated with the primary and secondary outcomes on univariate analysis were entered into backward stepwise logistic regression models to determine independent predictive factors. Results. There were 31 cases of nCPAP and 1 case of HFNC use in 31 patients (median age 3.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.8 - 7.6) months). The majority (n-23; 71.9%) presented with primary diarrhoea] disease. There were 2 deaths (6.5%), 17 (53.1%) PICU admissions, and 5 (15.6%) cases received invasive ventilation (NW failure). The median duration of hospital stay was 11.5 (IQR 6.0 - 17.5) days. Patients who failed NIV had lower admission SaO(2) levels than those without treatment failure (95% (IQR 95 - 99) v. 100% (IQR 100 - 100); p=0.03). On multiple logistic regression, lower temperature (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 - 0.78; p=0.02) and receiving inotropes in the emergency setting (aOR 23.05; 95% CI 1.64 - 325.06; p=0.02) were independently associated with PICU admission. Conclusion. nCPAP was used clinically for the management of children with respiratory compromise secondary to non-pulmonary illnesses, particularly diarrhoeal disease. Larger controlled clinical studies are needed to determine the effectiveness and utility of nCPAP in this population. HFNC was not commonly used, and this modality requires further investigation in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 88
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of high-flow nasal cannula for non-invasive ventilation in children
    Garcia Figueruelo, A.
    Urbano Villaescusa, J.
    Botran Prieto, M.
    Solana Garcia, M. J.
    Mencia Bartolome, S.
    Lopez-Herce Cid, J.
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2011, 75 (03): : 182 - 187
  • [2] HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA OXYGEN THERAPY VERSUS NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION FOR PREVENTION OF EXTUBATION FAILURE AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY IN CHILDREN - A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Balasubramanian, K.
    Venkatachalapathy, P.
    Ranjit, S.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (11)
  • [3] Observational Study of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Lampland, Andrea L.
    Plumm, Brenda
    Meyers, Patricia A.
    Worwa, Cathy T.
    Mammel, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 154 (02): : 177 - 182
  • [4] Comparison of the Efficacies of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-invasive Nasal Cannula Ventilation in Preventing Intubation
    Barlas, Uelkem Kocoglu
    Oezel, Abdulrahman
    Tosun, Volkan
    Bozkurt, Emine Ufuk
    Kihtir, Hasan Serdar
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 59 (02): : 214 - 220
  • [5] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or High-Flow Nasal Cannula?
    Ramanathan, R.
    Biniwale, M.
    NEONATOLOGY, 2014, 106 (03) : 268 - 269
  • [6] High-flow nasal cannula for children not compliant with continuous positive airway pressure
    Amaddeo, Alessandro
    Khirani, Sonia
    Frapin, Annick
    Teng, Theo
    Griffon, Lucie
    Fauroux, Brigitte
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2019, 63 : 24 - 28
  • [7] Non-invasive Ventilation with High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Helmet
    Krome, Susanne
    PNEUMOLOGIE, 2020, 74 (06): : 321 - 321
  • [8] High-flow nasal cannula therapy versus non-invasive ventilation in children with severe acute asthma exacerbation: An observational cohort study
    Pilar, J.
    Modesto i Alapont, V.
    Lopez-Fernandez, Y. M.
    Lopez-Macias, O.
    Garcia-Urabayen, D.
    Amores-Hernandez, I.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2017, 41 (07) : 418 - 424
  • [9] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Today
    Dani, Carlo
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (04) : 711 - 724
  • [10] Comparison of the Heated Humidified High-flow Nasal Cannula with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as Primary Respiratory Support for Preterm Neonates: A Prospective Observational Study
    Skariah, Tisha Ann
    Dias, Laveena
    Lewis, Leslie Edward
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATOLOGY, 2019, 10 (03) : 51 - 57