A channel evolution model to guide sustainable urban stream restoration

被引:37
|
作者
Booth, Derek B. [1 ]
Fischenich, Craig J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
urban streams; channel evolution models; restoration; sustainability; geomorphology; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; RIPARIAN-CORRIDOR; EROSION; REHABILITATION; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; URBANIZATION; WATERSHEDS; CHALLENGES; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/area.12180
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Channel evolution models (CEMs) are used to structure the interpretation of observed channel morphology to support long-term restoration of these systems. However, channels reflect the variety of their watersheds' climatological, ecological and physiographic contexts, and so no single CEM can be truly global'. Unrecognised differences between the assumptions and the reality of evolutionary trajectories of particular streams can subsequently lead to restoration actions that neither fully achieve their intended objectives nor successfully self-maintain even limited improvements. Despite the daunting variety of biophysical settings, however, urbanisation imposes distinctive, homogenising influences on virtually all watercourses, suggesting that even a relatively small set of evolutionary pathways can embrace much of the diversity of critical watershed drivers on urban channels. CEMs describing single-thread channel response to incision are most common in the published literature, but not every urban disturbance yields this classic sequence, initiated by excess transport capacity followed by incision, bank erosion, widening and ultimately a lowered re-equilibrated channel. A comprehensive urban CEM must also include responses under less common (but locally ubiquitous) conditions, such as excess sediment relative to transport capacity (the inverse' of the classic CEM), imposed constraints on vertical and/or lateral adjustment, and multi-thread channels or those influenced by instream or riparian vegetation. An urban CEM also requires a hierarchical framework that acknowledges fundamental differences in the process drivers within any given watershed, because a single observation of channel form can rarely pinpoint the context or evolutionary trajectory of every stream. We present a geomorphic framework for diagnosing and predicting the evolution of urban streams, potentially guiding the selection of restoration targets that are achievable within an urban context and sustainable without ongoing maintenance.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 421
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental constraints to urban stream restoration: Part 2
    Moses, Todd
    Morris, Scott
    Public Works, 1998, 129 (13): : 25 - 28
  • [32] Defining a Standard of Care for Urban Stream Restoration Projects
    Johnson, Peggy A.
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2014, 140 (03)
  • [33] Restoration as reconnection: A relational approach to urban stream repair
    Samuelson, Logan
    Blue, Brendon
    Thomas, Amanda
    NEW ZEALAND GEOGRAPHER, 2023, : 107 - 120
  • [34] Invertebrate and Microbial Response to Hyporheic Restoration of an Urban Stream
    Morley, Sarah A.
    Rhodes, Linda D.
    Baxter, Anne E.
    Goetz, Giles W.
    Wells, Abigail H.
    Lynch, Katherine D.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [35] Urban stream restoration case studies in North Carolina
    Jennings, GD
    Doll, BA
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF URBAN AND RURAL STREAMS, 2004, : 448 - 455
  • [36] Stream Restoration Projects: A Critical Analysis of Urban Greening
    Moran, Sharon
    LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 12 (02) : 111 - 128
  • [37] Highlighting assumptions of community engagement in urban stream restoration
    Cross, Denzell A.
    Chappell, Jessica C.
    FRESHWATER SCIENCE, 2022, : 532 - 538
  • [38] URBAN STREAM RESTORATION AND APPLIED PRACTICES IN NORTHEAST ILLINOIS
    Koepke, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2017, 12 (02): : 13 - 27
  • [39] How much is an urban stream worth? Using land senses and economic assessment of an urban stream restoration
    Yaacobi, Yehonatan
    Gasith, Avital
    Becker, Nir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (07): : 602 - 611
  • [40] Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems
    Violin, Christy R.
    Cada, Peter
    Sudduth, Elizabeth B.
    Hassett, Brooke A.
    Penrose, David L.
    Bernhardt, Emily S.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (06) : 1932 - 1949