A channel evolution model to guide sustainable urban stream restoration

被引:37
|
作者
Booth, Derek B. [1 ]
Fischenich, Craig J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
urban streams; channel evolution models; restoration; sustainability; geomorphology; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; RIPARIAN-CORRIDOR; EROSION; REHABILITATION; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; URBANIZATION; WATERSHEDS; CHALLENGES; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/area.12180
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Channel evolution models (CEMs) are used to structure the interpretation of observed channel morphology to support long-term restoration of these systems. However, channels reflect the variety of their watersheds' climatological, ecological and physiographic contexts, and so no single CEM can be truly global'. Unrecognised differences between the assumptions and the reality of evolutionary trajectories of particular streams can subsequently lead to restoration actions that neither fully achieve their intended objectives nor successfully self-maintain even limited improvements. Despite the daunting variety of biophysical settings, however, urbanisation imposes distinctive, homogenising influences on virtually all watercourses, suggesting that even a relatively small set of evolutionary pathways can embrace much of the diversity of critical watershed drivers on urban channels. CEMs describing single-thread channel response to incision are most common in the published literature, but not every urban disturbance yields this classic sequence, initiated by excess transport capacity followed by incision, bank erosion, widening and ultimately a lowered re-equilibrated channel. A comprehensive urban CEM must also include responses under less common (but locally ubiquitous) conditions, such as excess sediment relative to transport capacity (the inverse' of the classic CEM), imposed constraints on vertical and/or lateral adjustment, and multi-thread channels or those influenced by instream or riparian vegetation. An urban CEM also requires a hierarchical framework that acknowledges fundamental differences in the process drivers within any given watershed, because a single observation of channel form can rarely pinpoint the context or evolutionary trajectory of every stream. We present a geomorphic framework for diagnosing and predicting the evolution of urban streams, potentially guiding the selection of restoration targets that are achievable within an urban context and sustainable without ongoing maintenance.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 421
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Channel Evolution Model of Semiarid Stream Response to Urban-Induced Hydromodification
    Hawley, Robert J.
    Bledsoe, Brian P.
    Stein, Eric D.
    Haines, Brian E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2012, 48 (04): : 722 - 744
  • [2] Geomorphic assessments of stream conditions in urban watersheds: The incised channel evolution model
    Kumar, D
    Handy, MJ
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF URBAN AND RURAL STREAMS, 2004, : 180 - 188
  • [3] Urban stream restoration using a natural channel design approach
    Doll, BA
    Clinton, DR
    Jenkins, JW
    Patterson, JM
    Coleman, NJ
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF URBAN AND RURAL STREAMS, 2004, : 149 - 154
  • [4] Urban stream restoration
    Carpenter, DD
    Sinha, SK
    Brennan, K
    Slate, LO
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (07): : 491 - 493
  • [5] Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems
    Scoggins, Mateo
    Booth, Derek B.
    Fletcher, Tim
    Fork, Megan
    Gonzalez, Ana
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Hawley, Robert J.
    Roy, Allison H.
    Bilger, Erika E.
    Bond, Nick
    Burns, Matthew James
    Hopkins, Kristina G.
    Macneale, Kate H.
    Marti, Eugenia
    McKay, S. Kyle
    Neale, Martin W.
    Paul, Michael J.
    Rios-Touma, Blanca
    Russell, Kathryn L.
    Smith, Robert F.
    Wagner, Staryn
    Wenger, Seth
    FRESHWATER SCIENCE, 2022, : 404 - 419
  • [6] Stream restoration guide online
    不详
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1999, 97 (09) : A6 - A6
  • [7] Using sediment transport, stable channel design in urban stream restoration
    Byars, Morgan S.
    Kelly, Mike
    Public Works, 2002, 133 (09):
  • [8] Is Urban Stream Restoration Worth It?
    Kenney, Melissa A.
    Wilcock, Peter R.
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    Flores, Nicholas E.
    Martinez, Daniela C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2012, 48 (03): : 603 - 615
  • [9] Urban stream restoration structures
    Pagliara, S
    Chiavaccini, P
    ENHANCING URBAN ENVIRONMENT BY ENVIRONMENTAL UPGRADING AND RESTORATION, 2004, 43 : 239 - 252
  • [10] Ecosystem responses to channel restoration decline with stream size in urban river networks
    Levi, Peter S.
    McIntyre, Peter B.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 30 (05)