Metabolic control by insulin detemir in basal-bolus therapy: treat-to-target study in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

被引:10
|
作者
Nimri, Revital [1 ]
Lebenthal, Yael [1 ]
Shalitin, Shlomit [1 ,2 ]
Benzaquen, Hadasa [1 ]
Demol, Sharon [1 ]
Phillip, Moshe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Jesse Z & Sara Lea Shafer Inst Endocrinol & Diabe, Natl Ctr Childhood Diabet, IL-49202 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
basal-bolus intensive therapy; basal insulin analog; once; twice daily; pediatric; NPH INSULIN; PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILE; MEALTIME INSULIN; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; GLARGINE; ANALOG; HYPOGLYCEMIA; FREQUENCY; ASPART;
D O I
10.1111/pedi.12012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir administered once vs. twice daily in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Research Design In this prospective, open-label, treat-to-target study, 37 patients [mean age 12.7 +/- 3yr; diabetes duration 4.2 +/- 3yr, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.8 +/- 0.8%] were scheduled to receive insulin detemir once daily before breakfast, with pre-meal insulin aspart, for 1620wk. Detemir dose titration algorithm was based on age-related target fasting blood glucose levels during 48wk. Patients achieving target range continued on once-daily detemir (Group A) if up-titration could not be done due to hypoglycemia patients were switched to twice-daily detemir (Group B). Results Nineteen (51%) patients continued with once-daily detemir. HbA1c decreased significantly in both groups (A: 0.7%, p=0.02; B: 0.8%, p=0.004), without a significant difference between groups. The frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemic events/week decreased in both groups but a significant change was found only in Group A (10.92.7, p<0.05 vs. 8.75.8, NS), with no change in frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes in either group. No significant differences were found between and within groups for body mass index-standard deviation score, insulin requirement or treatment satisfaction. Group B patients were significantly younger than Group A patients (11.5 +/- 2.3 vs.13.8 +/- 3.2yr, p=0.01), with a higher percentage in active puberty (50 vs. 11%, p=0.003). Conclusion Since twice-daily determir showed no clinical advantage over once-daily detemir, it appears reasonable to commence all children on once-daily detemir, taking into consideration that younger children and those in active puberty may require twice-daily therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00542399).
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条