Environmental Confounding in Gene-Environment Interaction Studies

被引:37
|
作者
VanderWeele, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Ko, Yi-An [3 ]
Mukherjee, Bhramar [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
case-control; case-only; confounding; gene-environment; interaction; joint tests; marginal genetic association; LUNG-CANCER; POPULATION STRATIFICATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCUS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; DESIGN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kws439
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We show that, in the presence of uncontrolled environmental confounding, joint tests for the presence of a main genetic effect and gene-environment interaction will be biased if the genetic and environmental factors are correlated, even if there is no effect of either the genetic factor or the environmental factor on the disease. When environmental confounding is ignored, such tests will in fact reject the joint null of no genetic effect with a probability that tends to 1 as the sample size increases. This problem with the joint test vanishes under gene-environment independence, but it still persists if estimating the gene-environment interaction parameter itself is of interest. Uncontrolled environmental confounding will bias estimates of gene-environment interaction parameters even under gene-environment independence, but it will not do so if the unmeasured confounding variable itself does not interact with the genetic factor. Under gene-environment independence, if the interaction parameter without controlling for the environmental confounder is nonzero, then there is gene-environment interaction either between the genetic factor and the environmental factor of interest or between the genetic factor and the unmeasured environmental confounder. We evaluate several recently proposed joint tests in a simulation study and discuss the implications of these results for the conduct of gene-environment interaction studies.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gene-Environment Interaction in Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Murcray, Cassandra E.
    Lewinger, Juan Pablo
    Gauderman, W. James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (02) : 219 - 226
  • [22] Detection of gene-environment interaction by case-only studies
    Hamajima, N
    Yuasa, H
    Matsuo, K
    Kurobe, Y
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 29 (10) : 490 - 493
  • [23] THE USE OF REMOTE METHODS IN THE CONDUCT OF GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION STUDIES
    Galante, J.
    Mitchell, C.
    Renfigo, A.
    Burton, P.
    Lyons, R.
    Gallacher, J.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 : A10 - A10
  • [24] An Efficient Test of Gene-Environment Interaction for Genomewide Association Studies
    Sohns, Melanie
    Lewinger, Juan P.
    Bickeboller, Heike
    Thomas, Duncan C.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (08) : 920 - 921
  • [25] A combination test for detection of gene-environment interaction in cohort studies
    Coombes, Brandon
    Basu, Saonli
    McGue, Matt
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 41 (05) : 396 - 412
  • [26] Gene-environment interaction in evolutionary perspective: differential susceptibility to environmental influences
    Belsky, Jay
    Hartman, Sarah
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 13 (01) : 87 - 89
  • [27] A test for gene-environment interaction in the presence of measurement error in the environmental variable
    Aschard, Hugues
    Spiegelman, Donna
    Laville, Vincent
    Kraft, Pete
    Wang, Molin
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 42 (03) : 250 - 264
  • [28] Cancer and the environment: Gene-environment interaction.
    Rieger, PT
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2004, 31 (03) : 647 - 648
  • [29] Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression
    Smith, Erin N.
    Kruglyak, Leonid
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (04): : 810 - 824
  • [30] Biological implications of gene-environment interaction
    Rutter, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (07) : 969 - 975