Pseudo-dynamic earthquake source modeling, current status and prospect

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Seok Goo [1 ]
Park, Eunjin [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Geol Hazards Div, Daejeon 34132, South Korea
关键词
seismic hazard; fault-based earthquake source; pseudo-dynamic source modeling; strong ground motion simulation; GROUND-MOTION SIMULATION; RUPTURE MODEL; VALIDATION; STATISTICS; GENERATOR; 1-POINT;
D O I
10.14770/jgsk.2022.58.4.541
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Physics-based ground motion prediction studies are an essential element for advanced seismic hazard assessment. They make it possible to understand and predict the characteristics of near-source strong ground motions from future scenario earthquake models, which makes its importance greater in regions where observational data are scarce. Empirical Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) or stochastic strong ground-motion simulation methods have been mainly used in the community, but recently, strong ground-motion simulation approaches with fault-based earthquake source are becoming more attractive. They consider both the mechanical rupture process of an earthquake fault and the seismic wave propagation by adopting either dynamic or pseudo dynamic earthquake source modeling. In this review, we stated the research trends and prospects of the pseudo dynamic source modeling, which are expected to be more usable because of their computational efficiency. Although there are still challenges to be overcome, such as improving the input values of pseudo-dynamic source models, upgrading the complexity of the probabilistic model, and extending to high-frequency band (> 1 Hz), this method may overcome the limitations of the empirical GMPEs or stochastic simulation methods. We expect that it will greatly contribute to conducting advanced seismic hazard assessment and mitigation studies in the Korean Peninsula where observational strong ground-motion data are absolutely lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 548
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pseudo-dynamic testing with substructuring at the ELSA Laboratory
    Pegon, P
    Pinto, AV
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2000, 29 (07): : 905 - 925
  • [22] Pseudo-dynamic testing with substructuring at the ELSA laboratory
    Pegon, P.
    Pinto, A.V.
    Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29 (07) : 905 - 925
  • [23] Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method
    Choudhury, D
    Nimbalkar, S
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2005, 55 (09): : 699 - 702
  • [24] Pseudo-dynamic libraries in combinatorial chemistry.
    Corbett, AD
    Cheeseman, JD
    Gleason, JL
    Kazauskas, RJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 224 : U174 - U174
  • [25] The use of substructure method in pseudo-dynamic testing
    He, YB
    Pi, WJ
    STRUCTURES IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 1997, : 605 - 608
  • [26] Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method
    Choudhury, D.
    Nimbalkar, S.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2006, 56 (07): : 517 - 520
  • [27] Pseudo-dynamic testing of a concrete gravity dam
    Aldemir, Alper
    Binici, Baris
    Arici, Yalin
    Kurc, Ozgur
    Canbay, Erdem
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (11): : 1747 - 1763
  • [28] Pseudo-dynamic test on CFDST composite frame
    Huang L.
    Guo L.
    Lu F.
    Pu Y.-F.
    Wang J.-F.
    Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2022, 35 (06): : 1501 - 1510
  • [29] Simulation analysis of aqueduct pseudo-dynamic testing
    Li, Z.-N. (zhn88@263.net), 1600, Nanjing University of Aeronautics an Astronautics (26):
  • [30] Gallium arsenide pseudo-dynamic latched logic
    Lopez, JF
    Eshraghian, K
    Sarmiento, R
    Nunez, A
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1996, 32 (15) : 1353 - 1354