Creating an infrastructure for training in the responsible conduct of research: The university of Pittsburgh's experience

被引:19
|
作者
Barnes, BE
Friedman, CP
Rosenberg, JL
Russell, J
Beedle, A
Levine, AS
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Continuing Educ Hlth Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Biomed Informat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Conflict Interest Comm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Off Clin Res, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Res Conduct & Compliance Off, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001888-200602000-00005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In response to public concerns about the consequences of research misconduct, academic institutions have become increasingly cognizant of the need to implement comprehensive, effective training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) for faculty, staff, students, and external collaborators. The ability to meet this imperative is challenging as universities confront declining financial resources and increasing complexity of the research enterprise. The authors describe the University of Pittsburgh's design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based, institution-wide RCR training program called Research and Practice Fundamentals (RPF). This project, established in 2000, was embedded in the philosophy, organizational structure, and technology developed through the Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems grant from the National Library of Medicine. Utilizing a centralized, comprehensive approach, the RPF system provides an efficient mechanism for deploying content to a large, diverse cohort of learners and supports the needs of research administrators by providing access to information about who has successfully completed the training. During its first 3 years of operation, the RPF served over 17,000 users and issued more than 38,000 training certificates. The 18 modules that are currently available address issues required by regulatory mandates and other content areas important to the research community. RPF users report high levels of satisfaction with content and ease of using the system. Future efforts must explore methods to integrate non-RCR education and training into a centralized, cohesive structure. The University of Pittsburgh's experience with the RPF demonstrates the importance of developing an infrastructure for training that is comprehensive, scalable, reliable, centralized, affordable, and sustainable.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies
    Kligyte, Vykinta
    Marcy, Richard T.
    Sevier, Sydney T.
    Godfrey, Elaine S.
    Mumford, Michael D.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2008, 14 (01) : 3 - 31
  • [32] A Qualitative Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Development: Identification of Metacognitive Strategies
    Vykinta Kligyte
    Richard T. Marcy
    Sydney T. Sevier
    Elaine S. Godfrey
    Michael D. Mumford
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2008, 14 : 3 - 31
  • [33] A Qualitative Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Development: Identification of Metacognitive Strategies
    Vykinta Kligyte
    Richard T. Marcy
    Sydney T. Sevier
    Elaine S. Godfrey
    Michael D. Mumford
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2008, 14 (1) : 33 - 39
  • [34] Building an infrastructure to support the development, conduct, and reporting of informative clinical studies: The Rockefeller University experience
    Kost, Rhonda G. G.
    Devine, Rita K. K.
    Fernands, Mark
    Gottesman, Riva
    Kandpal, Manoj
    MacArthur, Robert B. B.
    O'Sullivan, Barbara
    Romanick, Michelle
    Ronning, Andrea
    Schlesinger, Sarah
    Tobin, Jonathan N. N.
    Vaughan, Roger
    Neville-Williams, Maija
    Krueger, James G. G.
    Coller, Barry S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [35] Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students
    Fisher, Celia B.
    Fried, Adam L.
    Feldman, Lindsay G.
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (06) : 496 - 518
  • [36] How to set the agenda for training in responsible conduct of research using the target audience as a narrative guide
    Blom, Fenneke
    Berentsen, Susan Maria Johanna
    van der Sande, Rob
    [J]. FACETS, 2022, 7 : 1258 - 1275
  • [37] An Appreciation of The Gene: An Intimate History by Siddhartha Mukherjee and a Call for Expanded Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research
    Morris, Evan D.
    [J]. YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2017, 90 (04): : 661 - 665
  • [38] Training of Teachers in a Research Master's Degree: the Experience of Moscow City Pedagogical University
    Vesmanov, S. V.
    Vesmanov, D. S.
    Zhad'ko, N., V
    Akopyan, G. A.
    [J]. PSIKHOLOGICHESKAYA NAUKA I OBRAZOVANIE-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2014, 19 (03): : 160 - 167
  • [39] How to Conduct Clinical Qualitative Research on the Patient's Experience
    Chenail, Ronald J.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2011, 16 (04) : 1173 - 1190
  • [40] Sino-US partnerships in research, education, and patient care: The experience of the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC
    Levine, Arthur S.
    McDonald, Margaret C.
    Bogosta, Charles E.
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 60 (10) : 1150 - 1156