Numerical Investigation on Direct MLPG for 2D and 3D Potential Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Mazzia, Annamaria [1 ]
Pini, Giorgio [1 ]
Sartoretto, Flavio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento ICEA, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Ca Foscari Venezia, DAIS, I-10173 Venice, Italy
来源
关键词
Meshless Methods; Poisson Problem; Generalized Moving Least Squares; Radial Basis Functions; Tensor Product Functions; MESHLESS SOLUTION; GALERKIN METHOD; ELEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Pure meshless techniques are promising methods for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDE). They alleviate difficulties,both in designing discretization meshes, and in refining/coarsening, a task which is demanded e.g. in adaptive strategies. Mesh less Local Petrov Galerkin (MLPG) methods are pure meshless techniques that receive increasing attention. Very recently, new methods, called Direct MLPG (DMLPG), have been proposed. They rely upon approximating PDE via the Generalized Moving Least Square method. DMLPG methods alleviate some difficulties of MLPG, e.g. numerical integration of tricky, non polynomial factors, in weak forms. DMLPG techniques require lower computational costs respect to their MLPG counterparts. In this paper we numerically analyze the solution of test 2D problems via DMLPG. We report about our expansion of meshless techniques to 3D problems. Finally, we perform comparisons between DMLPG and two MLPG techniques, when-solving 3D problems..
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 209
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical simulation of water impact for 2D and 3D bodies
    Yang, Qingyong
    Qiu, Wei
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 : 82 - 89
  • [32] Numerical methods for constrained optimization in 2D and 3D biomechanics
    Nedoma, J
    Bartos, M
    Kestránek, Z
    Kestranek, Z
    Stehlík, J
    NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 1999, 6 (07) : 557 - 586
  • [33] 2D and 3D numerical models of the growth of foraminiferal shells
    Labaj, P
    Topa, P
    Tyszka, J
    Alda, W
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2003, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2657 : 669 - 678
  • [34] 2D and 3D discrete numerical modelling of soil arching
    Ning Bao
    Jing Wei
    Jian-feng Chen
    Ping Wei
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2020, 21 (05): : 350 - 365
  • [35] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [36] Application of the wavelets in 2D and 3D scattering or radiation problems
    Anyutin, AP
    Kyurkchan, AG
    Stasevich, VI
    2003 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS, PROPAGATION AND EM THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 452 - 455
  • [37] Similarity Registration Problems for 2D/3D Ultrasound Calibration
    Vasconcelos, Francisco
    Peebles, Donald
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    Stoyanov, Danail
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2016, PT VI, 2016, 9910 : 171 - 187
  • [38] The method of fundamental solutions for 2D and 3D Stokes problems
    Young, DL
    Jane, SJ
    Fan, CM
    Murugesan, K
    Tsai, CC
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 211 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [39] 2D and 3D representations of solution spaces for CO problems
    Nowicki, E
    Smutnicki, C
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2004, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3037 : 483 - 490
  • [40] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248