Sample Size Calculation in Economic Experiments

被引:1
|
作者
Gruener, Sven [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Agr & Nutr Sci, Fac Nat Sci 3, Chair Agribusiness Management, Karl Freiherr von Fritsch Str 4, D-06120 Halle, Saale, Germany
来源
关键词
economic experiments; sample size; power; multiple testing; FIELD EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BEHAVIOR; MARKET; REAL; RISK; BIOSTATISTICS; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1515/jbnst-2019-0020
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Clinical studies and economic experiments are often conducted with randomized controlled trials. In clinical studies, power calculations are carried out as a standard. But what's about economic experiments? After describing the basic idea of the calculation procedure in a brief tutorial, I tackle the practice of sample size calculations in the field of experimental economics by considering the publications of 5 economic journals in the period 2000-2018. These are two top-ranked economic journals (Quarterly Journal of Economics and American Economic Review), the leading field journals in the area of experimental economics (Experimental Economics) and behavioral sciences (Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization), and a leading field journal in environmental economics (Environmental and Resource Economics). In contrast to clinical drug trials, sample size calculations have rarely been carried out by experimental economists. But the number of power calculations has slightly increased in recent years, especially in the top-ranked journals of economics. However, this can be partly explained by the fact that field experiments (in which scholars pay more attention to power analyses than in lab experiments these days) play an important role in these journals.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 823
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Mathematical Analysis applied to the CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE The sample size is (in) finite
    Reinoso Sanchez, Miguel Angel
    CIENCIA UNEMI, 2009, 2 (03): : 40 - 45
  • [32] SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION THROUGH THE INCORPORATION OF HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND DEPENDENCE FOR A PENALIZED t-STATISTIC IN MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS
    Hirakawa, Akihiro
    Hamada, Chikuma
    Yoshimura, Isao
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2012, 22 (02) : 260 - 275
  • [33] Sample-size calculation for preclinical dose-response experiments using heterogeneous tumour models
    Ciecior, Willy
    Ebert, Nadja
    Borgeaud, Nathalie
    Thames, Howard D.
    Baumann, Michael
    Krause, Mechthild
    Loeck, Steffen
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : 262 - 267
  • [34] A simulation-based sample size calculation method for pre-clinical tumor xenograft experiments
    Wu, Jianrong
    Yang, Shengping
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 28 (03) : 437 - 450
  • [35] A simple computerized program for the calculation of the required sample size necessary to ensure statistical accuracy in medical experiments
    Nutahara, H
    Hanada, E
    Kinukawa, N
    Kenjo, Y
    Antoku, Y
    Akazawa, K
    Nose, Y
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2001, 65 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [36] SIMPLIFY CALCULATION OF ECONOMIC PIPE SIZE
    NGUYEN, HX
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1978, 57 (02): : 143 - 144
  • [37] On sample size calculation in drug interaction trials
    Meyvisch, Paul
    Ebrahimpoor, Mitra
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2024, 23 (04) : 530 - 539
  • [38] Tips for troublesome sample-size calculation
    In, Junyong
    Kang, Hyun
    Kim, Jong Hae
    Kim, Tae Kyun
    Ahn, Eun Jin
    Lee, Dong Kyu
    Lee, Sangseok
    Park, Jae Hong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 114 - 120
  • [39] Sample Size Calculation Using Decision Theory
    Farhat, Milene Vaiano
    Eugenio, Nicholas Wagner
    Fossaluza, Victor
    BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, MAXENT 37, 2018, 239 : 167 - 176
  • [40] A theorem for calculation of the appropriate sample size in an estimation
    Zhang, Xue-feng
    Yang, Feng-bao
    Wang, Xu-zhu
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2017, 104 : 291 - 297