Safety methods in software process improvement

被引:0
|
作者
Lauritsen, T [1 ]
Stålhane, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Even if the application developers produce software in accordance with the customer requirements, they cannot guarantee that the software will behave in a safe way during the lifetime of the software. We define a system as safe if the risks related to its use are judged to be acceptable [1]. Safety must not be confused with security which broadly is defined as keeping the system unavailable for people who should not be able to access it. In this paper we introduce the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) technique into the software development process to improve the safety of business-critical software. In a business environment this means that the system does not behave in such a way that it causes the customer or his users to lose money or important information. We will use the term "business-safe" for this characteristic.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Software process improvement: Methods and lessons learned
    Curtis, B
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1997, : 624 - 625
  • [2] Software process evaluation for improvement using remote monitoring methods
    Butler, SJ
    Hope, S
    [J]. 6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT I, 2002, : 28 - 31
  • [3] Software Repository for Software Process Improvement
    Park, Eun-Ju
    Kom, Haeng-Kon
    Lee, Roger Y.
    [J]. COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, 131 : 51 - 64
  • [4] A software process simulator for software product and process improvement
    Donzelli, P
    Iazeolla, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, 1999, 195 : 525 - 538
  • [5] Safety critical software process improvement by multi-objective optimization algorithms
    Brito, Mario
    May, John
    [J]. SOFTWARE PROCESS DYNAMICS AND AGILITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4470 : 96 - +
  • [6] The software process improvement research
    Tan Ran
    Zhong Yuan
    Xue Senjun
    [J]. ICCSE'2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE & EDUCATION: ADVANCED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, NEW EDUCATION, 2006, : 863 - 866
  • [7] The software process: Evaluation and improvement
    Lopez, M
    [J]. WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, 2001, : 255 - 260
  • [8] Software process improvement environment
    Kim, Haeng-Kon
    Yang, Hae-Sool
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2006, PT 4, 2006, 3983 : 976 - 984
  • [9] TRIZ for software process improvement
    Stanbrook, T
    [J]. 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 466 - 468
  • [10] Software process improvement at ABB
    Larsson, S
    Kolb, P
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 150 : 46 - 49