This article discusses the changing role that work performed in private homes has played, and continues to play, in migration law in the Netherlands and at the EU level. It explores to what degree work performed in the home is defined as (exploitative) contractual labour or as inherent to family life, and what this means for claims to residence rights as a precursor to citizenship. It does this by reviewing case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) and of the European Court of Human Rights (EctHR) against the background of the Dutch case. It reveals tension between how citizenship is constructed and reproduced at the national level and how it is constructed and reproduced at the EU level. Following Adam McKeown, this article concludes that different perspectives on (reproductive) labour as a qualification for citizenship may reflect different perspectives on (reproductive) labour and the quality of citizenship.
机构:
Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, POB 15793, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, NetherlandsUniv Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, POB 15793, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
Leydesdorff, Loet
Wagner, Caroline
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ohio State Univ, John Glenn Sch Publ Affairs, Battelle Ctr Sci & Technol Policy, Columbus, OH USAUniv Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, POB 15793, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
Wagner, Caroline
Bornmann, Lutz
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, Adm Headquarters, D-80539 Munich, GermanyUniv Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, POB 15793, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands