Rediscovering the public/private divide in EU private law

被引:6
|
作者
Cherednychenko, Olha O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, European Private Law & Comparat Law, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Groningen Ctr European Financial Serv Law, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
TORT LAW; CONSUMER-PROTECTION; RISK REGULATION; LIABILITY; ENFORCEMENT; SERVICES; EUROPE; MATTER;
D O I
10.1111/eulj.12351
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article explores the role of the public/private divide within EU private law. It shows that although EU private law cuts across the boundaries of public and private law, the conceptual distinction between these well-established categories does matter within it and may lead to better lawmaking in the EU more generally. The legal grammar of a particular EU harmonisation measurewhich can be more "public" or "private"-may have important implications for the position of private parties at national level, for the CJEU's likely activism in this context, and ultimately for the measure's ability to realise its policy goals. Therefore, instead of ignoring the existing differences between public and private law, EU law should explicitly adopt the public/private law language in its discourse, without, however, introducing any sharp divide between these two areas.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 47
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条