Comparison of Selected-and Constructed-Response Items

被引：0
|
作者：
Li, Haiying [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Iowa Coll Aid, Des Moines, IA 50309 USA
[2] Org Econ Cooperat & Dev TJA Fellow, F-75016 Paris, France
来源：
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS AND DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM, PT II | 2022年 / 13356卷
关键词：
Constructed-response; PISA science; Selected-response;
D O I：
10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_70
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
A body of research on the assessment of scientific practices revealed that constructed-response items (CRI) are more valid for assessing scientific explanations than selected-response items (SRI). A few studies have compared the differences between these question item formats in small-scale formative science assessments. It is unclear, however, whether this phenomenon is universal in large-scale science assessments, which is within the scope of the present study. This study showed that one-third of students on average demonstrated inconsistent performance across 58 countries/regions when scientific practices were measured by SRI and CRI.
引用
收藏
页码：362 / 366
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
12345