A spatial multi-criteria planning scheme for evaluating riparian buffer restoration priorities

被引:21
|
作者
Zhao, Peng [1 ]
Xia, Beicheng [1 ]
Hu, Yanfang [1 ]
Yang, Yajun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Buffer restoration priorities; Riparian buffers; SWAT model; Non-point source pollution; Multi-criteria analysis; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; WATER-QUALITY; NITROGEN REMOVAL; LAND-USE; PLACEMENT; SOIL; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.037
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Vegetative riparian buffers are considered as key zones in providing natural regulation functions for water quality aimed at intercepting non-point source (NPS) nutrients from upslope areas to surface water. The function for reducing NPS nutrients may perform better in some locations than in others because not all factors affecting nutrient mitigation are equal in all locations. This paper intended to develop a spatial multi-criteria planning scheme involving nutrient export and buffer characteristics to evaluate the buffer restoration priorities. The Liuxihe River basin, located in central Guangdong Province, was used as a case study area for this research. Six indicators, including total nitrogen export, total phosphorous export, mean buffer width, buffer gap ratio, vegetation vigor and soil erodibility, were all integrated to assess priority. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to simulate total nitrogen export and total phosphorous export traveling from upslope areas to the buffer. Other indicators representing the buffer mitigation potential of NPS nutrients were calculated with the help of the Geographic Information System (GIS). To reduce redundancy and objectively discriminate the importance among indicators, a principle component weighting method was used to ascribe weights to each indicator. Total nitrogen export and total phosphorous export, which quantified the NPS nutrients export, were assigned the highest weights of 3.30 and 3.16, respectively. The aggregation result of the multi-criteria analysis generated a distribution map ranking the buffer restoration priorities. The results suggested that restoring the riparian buffers in sub-basins located in the lower reaches of Liuxihe River basin should be a priority. This planning strategy can be applied as a useful supporting tool for water quality management on watershed scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating multi-criteria ratings of financial investment options
    Chen, Andrew N. K.
    Wang, Shin-Yun
    Yu, Po-Lung
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2014, 31 : 46 - 58
  • [22] A multi-criteria methodology for evaluating alternative ultrasound devices
    Rossi, Diana
    Marciano, Filippo
    Cabassa, Paolo
    ERGONOMICS, 2019, 62 (10) : 1301 - 1312
  • [23] A new scheme for interactive multi-criteria decision making
    Streichert, Felix
    Tanaka-Yamawaki, Mieko
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4253 : 655 - 662
  • [24] A decision-supporting web model for integrating rural buildings with multi-criteria spatial planning
    Jeong, J. S.
    Garcia-Moruno, L.
    Hernandez-Blanco, J.
    INFORMES DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2014, 66 (533)
  • [25] Norwegian offshore wind power-Spatial planning using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Solbrekke, Ida Marie
    Sorteberg, Asgeir
    WIND ENERGY, 2024, 27 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [26] A spatial multi-criteria analysis approach for planning and management of community-scale desalination plants
    Dawoud, Osama
    Ahmed, Taha
    Abdel-Latif, Mahmoud
    Abunada, Ziyad
    DESALINATION, 2020, 485
  • [27] Combining Traffic Microsimulation Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainable Spatial-Traffic Planning
    Otkovick, Irena Istoka
    Karleusa, Barbara
    Deluka-Tibljas, Aleksandra
    Surdonja, Sanja
    Marusic, Mario
    LAND, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [28] Multi-criteria decision making - An approach to setting priorities in health care
    Nobre, FF
    Trotta, LTF
    Gomes, LFAM
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (23) : 3345 - 3354
  • [29] A multi-criteria programming model for intelligent tutoring planning
    Shi, Ruihong
    Lu, Peng
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4251 : 780 - 787
  • [30] Long-term multi-criteria improvement planning
    Hubinont, J. P.
    De Smet, Y.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2021, 149