DNA Reactivity as a Mode of Action and Its Relevance to Cancer Risk Assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Preston, R. Julian [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
DNA reactivity; mutation; key events; mode of action; cancer; CARCINOGENS; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1177/0192623312464437
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The ability of a chemical to induce mutations has long been a driver in the cancer risk assessment process. The default strategy has been that mutagenic chemicals demonstrate linear cancer dose responses, especially at low exposure levels. In the absence of additional confounding information, this is a reasonable approach, because risk assessment is appropriately considered as being protective of human health. The concept of mode of action has allowed for an opportunity to move off this default position; mutagenicity is now not considered as the driver but rather the mode of action is. In a more precise way, it is the set of key events that define a mode of action that is fundamental in defining the shape of a cancer dose response. A key event is an informative bioindicator of the cancer response and as such should be predictive of the tumor response, at least in a qualitative way. A clear example of the use of key events in cancer risk assessment is for DNA reactive chemicals. A series of such key events is initiated by the production of DNA damage in target cells from direct interaction of the chemical with DNA leading to the production of mutations by misreplication that results in enhanced cell replication. This enhanced cell replication eventually leads to the development of preneoplastic cells and ultimately overt neoplasms. The response of each of these key events to dose of the chemical can inform the cancer dose-response curve shape. Thus, the dose-response curve for any DNA-reactive chemical can be predicted from knowledge of its mode of action and the behavior of the induced key events.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 325
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mode-of-action analysis for induction of rat liver tumors by pyrethrins: relevance to human cancer risk
    Osimitz, Thomas G.
    Lake, Brian G.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 39 (06) : 501 - 511
  • [22] Carcinogenic mode of action of folpet in mice and evaluation of its relevance to humans
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Gordon, Elliot B.
    Singh, Pramila
    Arce, Gail T.
    Nyska, Abraham
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 40 (06) : 531 - 545
  • [23] On the application of data on mode of action to carcinogenic risk assessment
    Rice, JM
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 78 (02) : 175 - 177
  • [24] Systems Biology and Mode of Action Based Risk Assessment
    Edwards, Stephen W.
    Preston, R. Julian
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 106 (02) : 312 - 318
  • [25] Mode of action of carcinogenic nitrosamines and cumulative risk assessment
    Ledirac, Nathalie
    Bertomeu, Lisa
    Bernier, Marie-Charlotte
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 229 : S70 - S70
  • [26] Mode of action in relevance of rodent liver tumors to human cancer risk (vol 89, pg 51, 2006)
    Holsapple, MP
    Pitot, HC
    Cohen, SM
    Boobis, AR
    Klaunig, JE
    Pastoor, T
    Dellarco, VL
    Dragan, YP
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 90 (02) : 596 - 596
  • [27] Sp7 Action in the Skeleton: Its Mode of Action, Functions, and Relevance to Skeletal Diseases
    Hojo, Hironori
    Ohba, Shinsuke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (10)
  • [28] Relevance of DNA Adduct Approaches to Regulatory Risk Assessment.
    Schoeny, R. S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2011, 52 : S29 - S29
  • [29] Formaldehyde Carcinogenicity Research: 30 Years and Counting for Mode of Action, Epidemiology, and Cancer Risk Assessment
    Swenberg, James A.
    Moeller, Benjamin C.
    Lu, Kun
    Rager, Julia E.
    Fry, Rebecca C.
    Starr, Thomas B.
    TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (02) : 181 - 189
  • [30] Evaluation of mode of action in assessment of cancer risk associated with exposure to 1, 4-dichlorobenzene.
    Odin, M
    Bosch, S
    Osier, M
    McGinnis, P
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 72 : 138 - 139