Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer:: Prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography

被引:281
|
作者
Soriano, A
Castells, A
Ayuso, C
Ayuso, JR
de Caralt, MT
Ginès, MA
Real, MI
Gilabert, R
Quintó, L
Trilla, A
Feu, F
Montanyà, X
Fernández-Cruz, L
Navarro, S
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Gastroenterol, Inst Malaties Digest, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Inst Malaties Digest, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Dept Radiol, Ctr Diagnost Imatge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Unit Assessment Support & Prevent, Hosp Clin, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2004年 / 99卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04087.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of different strategies based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), helical computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiography (A) in the staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer. Methods: All consecutive patients with pancreatic carcinoma judged fit for laparotomy were studied by EUS, CT, MRI, and A. Results of each of the imaging techniques regarding primary tumor, locoregional extension, lymph-node involvement, vascular invasion, distant metastases, tumor TNM stage, and tumor resectability were compared with the surgical findings. Univariate, logistic regression, decision, and cost minimization analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-two patients with pancreatic cancer were. included. Helical CT had the highest accuracy in assessing extent of primary tumor (73%), locoregional extension (74%), vascular invasion (83%), distant metastases (88%), tumor TNM stage (46%), and tumor resectability (83%), whereas EUS had the highest accuracy in assessing tumor size (r=0.85) and lymph node involvement (65%). The decision analysis demonstrated that the best strategy to assess tumor resectability was based on CT or EUS as initial test, followed by the alternative technique in those potentially resectable cases. Cost minimization analysis favored the sequential strategy in which EUS was used as a confirmatory technique in those patients in whom helical CT suggested resectability of the tumor. Conclusions: Helical CT and EUS are the most useful individual imaging techniques in the staging of pancreatic cancer. In those cases with potentially resectable tumors a sequential approach consisting of helical CT as an initial test and EUS as a confirmatory technique seems to be the most reliable and cost minimization strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 501
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Agreement validation between axial imaging modalities and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging resectability of pancreatic cancer.
    Pham, Nghia
    Pappas, Sam G.
    Enchia, Ebenezer
    Gliniewicz, Adam
    Small, William
    Gupta, Neil
    Dudiak, Christine M.
    Mahmoud, Faaiza
    Ahuja, Aakash
    Aquisto, Thomas
    Gooneratne, Nihal
    Nanda, Tejvir
    Ozga, Timothy
    Martin, Brendan
    Thomas, Tarita
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [32] Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance, imaging in the assessment of pelvic pathology
    Balan, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 58 (01) : 147 - 155
  • [33] Endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastric cancer: determination of tumor invasion depth, nodal involvement and surgical resectability
    Wei-Dong Xi Guo-Sheng Ren Department of General Surgery
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003, 9 (02) : 254 - 257
  • [34] Endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastric cancer: determination of tumor invasion depth, nodal involvement and surgical resectability
    Xi, WD
    Zhao, C
    Ren, GS
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 9 (02) : 254 - 257
  • [35] COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF RECTAL-CANCER
    GUINET, C
    BUY, JN
    GHOSSAIN, MA
    SEZEUR, A
    MALLET, A
    BIGOT, JM
    VADROT, D
    ECOIFFIER, J
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1990, 125 (03) : 385 - 388
  • [36] TNM-staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic cancer. Prospective evaluation by laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS)
    ScheelHincke, JD
    Mortensen, MB
    Pless, T
    Qvist, N
    Hovendal, CP
    GUT, 1997, 41 : A15 - A15
  • [37] Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: Comparison with histologic findings
    Bianchi, PP
    Ceriani, C
    Rottoli, M
    Tozilli, G
    Pompili, G
    Malesci, A
    Ferraroni, M
    Montorsi, M
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (09) : 1222 - 1227
  • [38] Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: Comparison with histologic findings
    Paolo P. Bianchi
    Chiara Ceriani
    Matteo Rottoli
    Guido Torzilli
    Giovanni Pompili
    Alberto Malesci
    Monica Ferraroni
    Marco Montorsi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2005, 9 : 1222 - 1228
  • [39] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment
    Agustín Campos
    Federico Mata
    Rosa Reboll
    María Luisa Peris
    Jorge Basterra
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 1405 - 1411
  • [40] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment
    Campos, Agustin
    Mata, Federico
    Reboll, Rosa
    Luisa Peris, Maria
    Basterra, Jorge
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (03) : 1405 - 1411