Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Followed by Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Infectious Spondylitis

被引:14
|
作者
Ha, Kee-Yong [1 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [1 ]
Seo, Jun-Yeong [2 ]
Bae, Seung-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Jeju Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Cheju, South Korea
来源
关键词
spondylitis; anterior interbody fusion; minimally invasive; percutaneous pedicle instrumentation; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; GRAFT; CAGES; DISTRACTION; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; STRUT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf56
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate the clinical feasibility and outcomes from direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using autogenous bone grafts and percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PPI) for infectious spondylitis. Summary of Background Data: As one of the minimally invasive techniques, PPI has been attempted for various degenerative lumbar spine disorders combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. PPI has been played more roles recently as an internal fixation method for infectious spondylitis. However, the clinical outcomes of DLIF using an autogenous bone graft combined with PPI for infectious spondylitis have been rarely reported. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age, 60.3 +/- 18.8 y) who suffered from pyogenic spondylitis underwent single-stage DLIF using an autogenous iliac bone graft combined with PPI. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and eradication of primary disease. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by changes of affected segmental lordosis and fusion status. Results: Bony fusion and eradication of primary disease were obtained in all patient except 1 case during the follow-up (mean, 31.3 +/- 13.1 mo; range 14-46 mo). Preoperative VAS (7 +/- 1.2) and ODI (61.3 +/- 5.4) scores improved significantly at the last follow-up (VAS, 3.4 +/- 1.5; ODI, 32.3 +/- 15.4). C-reactive protein normalized at postoperative 20.1 +/- 0.7 days (range, 15-28 d). Although height and lordosis in the affected segment were restored by surgery, all patients showed loss of the restored lordosis and height at the final follow-up. Loss of the restored lordosis and height were related to subsidence of the grafted bone. Conclusions: Minimally invasive PPI followed by debridement and DLIF was a feasible surgical alternative in our consecutive 16 cases of pyogenic spondylitis. In most cases, however the subsidence of anteriorly grafted fusion was inevitable despite successful fusion and eradication of the primary lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:E95 / E100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Comparison of Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treating Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Yang, Lihui
    Du, Peng
    Zang, Lei
    An, Likun
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Jian
    Diao, Wenbo
    Gao, Jian
    Yan, Ming
    Zhu, Wenyi
    Yuan, Shuo
    Fan, Ning
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2025, 38 (03): : E212 - E220
  • [42] Salvage Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Pseudarthrosis after Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note
    Masuda, Soichiro
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Kimura, Hiroaki
    Tanida, Shimei
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : 107 - 112
  • [43] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND PLATES
    STEFFEE, AD
    SITKOWSKI, DJ
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (227) : 99 - 102
  • [44] Advances in posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Brislin, B
    Vaccaro, AR
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 33 (02) : 367 - +
  • [45] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants
    Rickert, M.
    Arabmotlagh, M.
    Carstens, C.
    Behrbalk, E.
    Rauschmann, M.
    Fleege, C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 162 - 169
  • [46] Posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Madhu, Tiruveedhula S.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 22 (06): : 406 - 413
  • [47] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - Comment
    Alday, R
    NEUROCIRUGIA, 2001, 12 (05): : 455 - 455
  • [48] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - Response
    Okuda, Shinya
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [49] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION UPDATED
    CLOWARD, RB
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1985, (193) : 16 - 19
  • [50] THE FAILED POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    WETZEL, FT
    LAROCCA, H
    SPINE, 1991, 16 (07) : 839 - 845