Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Followed by Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Infectious Spondylitis

被引:14
|
作者
Ha, Kee-Yong [1 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [1 ]
Seo, Jun-Yeong [2 ]
Bae, Seung-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[2] Jeju Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Cheju, South Korea
来源
关键词
spondylitis; anterior interbody fusion; minimally invasive; percutaneous pedicle instrumentation; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; GRAFT; CAGES; DISTRACTION; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; STRUT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf56
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To investigate the clinical feasibility and outcomes from direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using autogenous bone grafts and percutaneous posterior instrumentation (PPI) for infectious spondylitis. Summary of Background Data: As one of the minimally invasive techniques, PPI has been attempted for various degenerative lumbar spine disorders combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. PPI has been played more roles recently as an internal fixation method for infectious spondylitis. However, the clinical outcomes of DLIF using an autogenous bone graft combined with PPI for infectious spondylitis have been rarely reported. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age, 60.3 +/- 18.8 y) who suffered from pyogenic spondylitis underwent single-stage DLIF using an autogenous iliac bone graft combined with PPI. Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and eradication of primary disease. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by changes of affected segmental lordosis and fusion status. Results: Bony fusion and eradication of primary disease were obtained in all patient except 1 case during the follow-up (mean, 31.3 +/- 13.1 mo; range 14-46 mo). Preoperative VAS (7 +/- 1.2) and ODI (61.3 +/- 5.4) scores improved significantly at the last follow-up (VAS, 3.4 +/- 1.5; ODI, 32.3 +/- 15.4). C-reactive protein normalized at postoperative 20.1 +/- 0.7 days (range, 15-28 d). Although height and lordosis in the affected segment were restored by surgery, all patients showed loss of the restored lordosis and height at the final follow-up. Loss of the restored lordosis and height were related to subsidence of the grafted bone. Conclusions: Minimally invasive PPI followed by debridement and DLIF was a feasible surgical alternative in our consecutive 16 cases of pyogenic spondylitis. In most cases, however the subsidence of anteriorly grafted fusion was inevitable despite successful fusion and eradication of the primary lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:E95 / E100
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation in the surgical management of lumbar tuberculous spondylitis
    Lee, J. S.
    Moon, K. P.
    Kim, S. J.
    Suh, K. T.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (02): : 210 - 214
  • [2] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [3] Clinical value and effectiveness profiles of oblique lateral interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar brucellosis spondylitis
    Jia, Y. -l.
    Zuo, X. -h.
    Zhang, Y.
    Yao, Y.
    Yin, Y. -l.
    Yang, X. -m.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (09) : 3854 - 3863
  • [4] Simultaneous Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation: Early Experience and Technical Considerations
    Drazin, Doniel
    Kim, Terrence T.
    Johnson, J. Patrick
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [5] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [6] Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study
    Kadam, Abhijeet
    Wigner, Nathan
    Saville, Philip
    Arlet, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (06) : 650 - 660
  • [7] Extreme lateral interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation for spondylodiscitis
    Blizzard, Daniel J.
    Hills, Christopher P.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    Brown, Christopher R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1758 - 1761
  • [8] Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Posterior Instrumentation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Zhou, XiaoCheng
    Zhou, Qiujun
    Jin, Xiaoliang
    Zhang, Jinjie
    Song, Zhoufeng
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 1375 - 1389
  • [9] Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Fessler, RG
    NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 52 (06) : 1512 - 1512
  • [10] Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Khoo, LT
    Palmer, S
    Laich, DT
    Fessler, RG
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) : S166 - S181