Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

被引:19
|
作者
Cash, J. Christian [1 ]
Zehetner, Joerg [1 ]
Hedayati, Bobak [1 ]
Bildzukewicz, Nikolai A. [1 ]
Katkhouda, Namir [1 ]
Mason, Rodney J. [1 ]
Lipham, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy; Minimally invasive; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; DISTAL ESOPHAGUS; EN-BLOC; GASTRIC MOBILIZATION; LYMPH-NODES; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; ADENOCARCINOMA; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3230-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Most published minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques involve a multiple field approach, including laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) should potentially reduce the complications associated with thoracotomy. This study aims to compare outcomes of LTE with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) and en-bloc esophagectomy (EBE). Methods Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who had an LTE for cancer between July 2008 and July 2012 at our institution. Data was compared with an historic cohort of patients who underwent OTE and EBE at the same institution from July 2002 to July 2008. Results There were 33 patients with LTE, compared with 60 patients with OTE and 139 with EBE. The presence of minor operative complications was similar (p = 0.36), but major complications were significantly less common in the LTE group (12, 23 and 33 %, respectively; p = 0.04). The median number of blood transfusions during hospitalization was significantly lower in the LTE group (0, 2.5 and 3, respectively; p = 0.005). Median tumor size was significantly smaller (1.5, 2.2, and 3 cm, respectively; p = 0.03), but the LTE group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with neoadjuvant treatment (39, 14 and 29 %, respectively; p = 0.008). Median lymph node yield for LTE was lower (24, 36 and 48, respectively; p < 0.0001), but the percentage of patients with positive nodes was similar (33, 33 and 39 %, respectively; p = 0.69). Mortality was equivalent among the groups (0, 2 and 4 %, respectively; p = 0.38). The median LOS for the LTE group was significantly lower (10, 13 and 15 days, respectively; p < 0.0001). Overall survival was not different between the three groups (p = 0.65), with median survival at 24 months of 70, 65 and 65 %, respectively. Conclusion LTE can be performed safely with less major complications and shorter hospital stay than open esophagectomy. The reduced lymph-node harvest did not impact overall survival.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma
    Yu, Lei
    Wu, Ji-xiang
    Gao, Yu-shun
    Li, Jian-ye
    Zhang, Yun-feng
    Ke, Ji
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06): : 2382 - 2389
  • [42] Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Ji, Hong
    Birkmeyer, Nancy J.
    Orringer, Mark B.
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (02): : 424 - 429
  • [43] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation
    Coker, Alisa M.
    Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S.
    Cheverie, Joslin
    Jacobsen, Garth R.
    Sandler, Bryan J.
    Talamini, Mark A.
    Bouvet, Michael
    Horgan, Santiago
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [44] Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma
    Lei Yu
    Ji-xiang Wu
    Yu-shun Gao
    Jian-ye Li
    Yun-feng Zhang
    Ji Ke
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 2382 - 2389
  • [45] Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Arin Kumar Saha
    Christopher D. Sutton
    Henry Sue-Ling
    Simon P. L. Dexter
    Abeezar I. Sarela
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 119 - 124
  • [46] LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH ESOPHAGOGASTROPLASTY
    DEPAULA, AL
    HASHIBA, K
    FERREIRA, EAB
    DEPAULA, RA
    GRECCO, E
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 5 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [47] Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Saha, Arin Kumar
    Sutton, Christopher D.
    Sue-Ling, Henry
    Dexter, Simon P. L.
    Sarela, Abeezar I.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (01): : 119 - 124
  • [48] Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy
    Kyle A. Perry
    C. Kristian Enestvedt
    Brian S. Diggs
    Blair A. Jobe
    John G. Hunter
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23
  • [49] Oropharyngeal dysphagia in esophageal cancer before and after transhiatal esophagectomy
    Martin, RE
    Letsos, P
    Taves, DH
    Inculet, RI
    Johnston, H
    Preiksaitis, HG
    DYSPHAGIA, 2001, 16 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [50] Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer Before and After Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    Ruth E. Martin
    Penelope Letsos
    Donald H. Taves
    Richard I. Inculet
    Heather Johnston
    Harold G. Preiksaitis
    Dysphagia, 2001, 16 : 23 - 31