Increased targeting of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic kidney disease does not improve atheroma burden or cardiovascular function

被引:54
|
作者
Isbel, NM [1 ]
Haluska, B
Johnson, DW
Beller, E
Hawley, C
Marwick, TH
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2005.06.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Although multiple risk factor intervention (MRFI) is recommended to reduce the increased morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in chronic kidney disease (CKD), its efficacy is unknown. We studied the efficacy of a MRFI program in CKD. Methods This randomized controlled study of 200 patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD compared a physician-supervised, nurse-driven MRFI clinic (focused on dyslipidemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, blood pressure [BP], anemia, and hyperphosphatemia) with conventional care in CKD. One hundred eleven subjects completed 2 years of follow-up (median follow-up 674 days [interquartile range {IQR} 348-719 days]). Outcome measures were atheroma burden (carotid intimamedia thickness [IMT]) and endothelial function (brachial artery reactivity [BAR]). Results The MRFI group showed significant improvements, compared with usual care, in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-30.9 mg/dL vs -12.7 mg/dL, P = .001), homocysteine (-6.95 vs -0.67 mu mol/L, P < .001), systolic BP (-6.9 vs -0.2 mm Hg, P = .049), and diastolic BP (-4.8 vs -1.0 mm of Hg, P = .043). No significant changes were seen in serum phosphate or hemoglobin level. Despite observed improvements in risk factors, no differences from baseline were demonstrated for IMT (-0.00 vs -0.01 mm, P = .533) or BAR (0.09% vs 0.22%, P = .834). Forty-two patients reached a composite end point of CVD death, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, nonfatal stroke, and amputation and this was similar between groups (23 vs 19 events, P = .475). Conclusions A MRFI program was not associated with improvement in vascular structure or function in stage 4 or 5 patients with CKD.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 753
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endothelial Cell Dysfunction and Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
    Baaten, Constance C. F. M. J.
    Vondenhoff, Sonja
    Noels, Heidi
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2023, 132 (08) : 970 - 992
  • [32] New cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease
    Cases, A
    NEFROLOGIA, 2004, 24 (06): : 62 - 72
  • [33] Classic risk factors for cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease
    De Santo, NG
    Cirillo, M
    Iacono, G
    Capasso, G
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 25 (06) : 357 - 357
  • [34] Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Chronic Kidney Disease in Children
    Mitsnefes, Mark M.
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 41 (05) : 434 - 438
  • [35] Microalbuminuria and chronic kidney disease as risk factors for cardiovascular disease
    Sarafidis, Pantelis A.
    Bakris, George L.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 (09) : 2366 - 2374
  • [36] Reducing the burden of cardiovascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease
    Qunibi, WY
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 : S95 - S102
  • [37] Arterial stiffness and increased cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease
    Ma, Yuxia
    Zhou, Lin
    Dong, Jinghui
    Zhang, Xiaoshen
    Yan, Shi
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (07) : 1157 - 1164
  • [38] Arterial stiffness and increased cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease
    Yuxia Ma
    Lin Zhou
    Jinghui Dong
    Xiaoshen Zhang
    Shi Yan
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2015, 47 : 1157 - 1164
  • [39] Cardiovascular Burden in Children With Chronic Kidney Disease
    Deshpande, Shriprasad
    Eick, Stephanie
    Winterberg, Pamela D.
    CIRCULATION, 2015, 132
  • [40] Cardiovascular risk factors and prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic renal disease
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, Bernardo
    Correa-Rotter, Ricardo
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (16) : 2687 - 2699