Prostate cancer screening: Promise and peril - A review

被引:13
|
作者
Godley, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Hematol Oncol, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION | 1999年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
cancer screening; length bias; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1046/j.1525-1500.1999.99033.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review summarizes the current status of and recommendations for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen in light of recent reductions in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. It describes how the uncertain effectiveness of aggressive treatment for prostate cancer and a reservoir of unsuspected indolent cancers make prostate cancer fit poorly into conventional screening models. The large proportion of men with unsuspected prostate cancers that may not cause morbidity or mortality and are unlikely to benefit from aggressive treatment decrease the effectiveness of a screening program. In addition, indolent, unsuspected prostate cancers in the screening population accentuate the detrimental effects of length bias on studies evaluating the effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. Screening tests for prostate cancer will continue to improve, but chemoprevention or nutritional prevention with vitamins and micronutrients such as tocopherols or selenic may prove to be effective methods of reducing prostate cancer incidence and should be aggressively investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 324
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lung cancer screening - Progress or peril
    Mulshine, James L.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2008, 13 (04): : 435 - 438
  • [32] The promise and potential peril of at-home oral cancer testing
    Lingen, Mark W.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 135 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [33] Screening for prostate cancer: A Cochrane systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    O'Connor, Denise
    Green, Sally
    Wilt, Timothy
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [34] Screening for prostate cancer: A Cochrane systematic review
    Dragan Ilic
    Denise O’Connor
    Sally Green
    Timothy Wilt
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2007, 18 : 279 - 285
  • [35] The Promise, Peril of Quantum Simulation
    不详
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2022, 65 (10) : 18 - 18
  • [36] Peak energy: promise or peril?
    Kurt Kleiner
    Nature Climate Change, 2009, 1 (903) : 31 - 33
  • [37] Promise and Peril for Generic Drugs
    Sharfstein, Joshua M.
    Greene, Jeremy
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (06) : 733 - 734
  • [38] The Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: status and promise
    Andriole, GL
    Reding, D
    Hayes, RB
    Prorok, PC
    Gohagan, JK
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (04) : 358 - 361
  • [39] THE PROMISE AND THE PERIL OF THE TRUMP ECONOMY
    Tully, Shawn
    FORTUNE, 2017, 175 (03) : 80 - +
  • [40] The promise and peril of chemical probes
    Arrowsmith, Cheryl H.
    Audia, James E.
    Austin, Christopher
    Baell, Jonathan
    Bennett, Jonathan
    Blagg, Julian
    Bountra, Chas
    Brennan, Paul E.
    Brown, Peter J.
    Bunnage, Mark E.
    Buser-Doepner, Carolyn
    Campbell, Robert M.
    Carter, Adrian J.
    Cohen, Philip
    Copeland, Robert A.
    Cravatt, Ben
    Dahlin, Jayme L.
    Dhanak, Dashyant
    Edwards, Aled M.
    Frye, Stephen V.
    Gray, Nathanael
    Grimshaw, Charles E.
    Hepworth, David
    Howe, Trevor
    Huber, Kilian V. M.
    Jin, Jian
    Knapp, Stefan
    Kotz, Joanne D.
    Kruger, Ryan G.
    Lowe, Derek
    Mader, Mary M.
    Marsden, Brian
    Mueller-Fahrnow, Anke
    Mueller, Susanne
    O'Hagan, Ronan C.
    Overington, John P.
    Owen, Dafydd R.
    Rosenberg, Saul H.
    Roth, Brian
    Ross, Ruth
    Schapira, Matthieu
    Schreiber, Stuart L.
    Shoichet, Brian
    Sundstrom, Michael
    Superti-Furga, Giulio
    Taunton, Jack
    Toledo-Sherman, Leticia
    Walpole, Chris
    Walters, Michael A.
    Willson, Timothy M.
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 11 (08) : 536 - 541