Recognition of emotional facial expressions in benzodiazepine dependence and detoxification

被引:6
|
作者
Zurowska, Natasza [1 ]
Kalwa, Agnieszka [2 ]
Rymarczyk, Krystyna [1 ]
Habrat, Boguslaw [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Inst Cognit & Behav Neurosci, Dept Expt Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Inst Psychiat & Neurol, Dept Child & Adolescence Psychiat, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Inst Psychiat & Neurol, Dept Prevent & Treatment Addict, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Benzodiazepine use; detoxification; empathy; emotion recognition; SEX-DIFFERENCES; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS; EMPATHY QUOTIENT; DIAZEPAM; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; ADDICTION; DISGUST; MEMORY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1080/13546805.2018.1426448
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: The study investigates how benzodiazepine (BZD) use and detoxification affects empathy and the recognition and intensity rating of emotional facial expressions. The sample comprised 43 participants in three groups: (1) during detoxification (N=13), (2) after detoxification (N=15), (3) a matched control group (N=15). Clinical subjects were recruited from in-patients of an addiction treatment unit.Methods: Empathy levels were tested with the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short). Recognition accuracy and emotion intensity rating were based on a computerised task displaying static and dynamic facial expressions of joy, anger, sadness, and fear.Results: The controls proved more accurate than both experimental groups in identifying facial expressions of negative emotions. Joy recognition proved most accurate overall. Among the clinical subjects, women in particular exhibited an impaired ability to correctly identify negative emotions from facial expressions. Dynamic stimuli were better recognised than static ones albeit only in the experimental groups. No significant differences were found for emotion intensity ratings and EQ scores.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the impaired facial emotion recognition accuracy is not caused by deficits in empathy. No improvement was recorded post-detoxification which may indicate impaired interpersonal functioning among BZD users. Further research is warranted in light of this study's limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 87
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Empathy, but not mimicry restriction, influences the recognition of change in emotional facial expressions
    Kosonogov, Vladimir
    Titova, Alisa
    Vorobyeva, Elena
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (10): : 2106 - 2115
  • [42] Recognition of emotional facial expressions in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Pelc, Karine
    Kornreich, Charles
    Foisy, Marie-Line
    Dan, Bernard
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2006, 35 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [43] Children's Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions Through Photographs and Drawings
    Brechet, Claire
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 178 (02): : 139 - 146
  • [44] Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition
    Nomi, Jason S.
    Rhodes, Matthew G.
    Cleary, Anne M.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2013, 27 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [45] Age-Related Decrease in Recognition of Emotional Facial and Prosodic Expressions
    Lambrecht, Lena
    Kreifelts, Benjamin
    Wildgruber, Dirk
    EMOTION, 2012, 12 (03) : 529 - 539
  • [46] The role of dynamic non-emotional facial expressions in face recognition
    Gobbo, Silvia
    Daini, Roberta
    PERCEPTION, 2021, 50 (1_SUPPL) : 136 - 136
  • [47] Visual evoked potentials in humans during recognition of emotional facial expressions
    Mikhailova E.S.
    Davydov D.V.
    Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 1999, 29 (6) : 687 - 694
  • [48] Choreographing emotional facial expressions
    Sloan, Robin J. S.
    Robinson, Brian
    Scott-Brown, Ken
    Moore, Fhionna
    Cook, Malcolm
    COMPUTER ANIMATION AND VIRTUAL WORLDS, 2010, 21 (3-4) : 203 - 213
  • [49] Facial expressions and emotional anticipation
    Jellema, T.
    Palumbo, L.
    PERCEPTION, 2010, 39 : 94 - 94
  • [50] EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSIONS IN ADVERTISING
    WEINBERG, P
    KONERT, FJ
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1984, 11 : 607 - 611