Strategies for comparing gene expression profiles from different microarray platforms: Application to a case-control experiment

被引:30
|
作者
Severgnini, Marco
Bicciato, Silvio
Mangano, Eleonora
Scarlatti, Francesca
Mezzelani, Alessandra
Mattioli, Michela
Ghidoni, Riccardo
Peano, Clelia
Bonnal, Raoul
Viti, Federica
Milanesi, Luciano
De Bellis, Gianluca
Battaglia, Cristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Interdisciplinary Ctr Biomol Studies & Ind Applic, Milan, Italy
[2] CNR, Inst Biomed Technol, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Chem Proc Engn, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Sci & Biomed Technol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, San Paolo Univ Hosp, Biochem & Mol Biol Lab, Milan, Italy
[6] Osped Maggiore, IRCCS, Lab Expt Hematol & Mol Genet, Dept Hematol 2, Milan, Italy
关键词
platform comparison; high-density microarray; comparison strategy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ab.2006.03.023
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis of microarray data is increasingly important, considering both the availability of multiple platforms using disparate technologies and the accumulation in public repositories of data sets from different laboratories. We addressed the issue of comparing Gene expression profiles from two microarray platforms by devising a standardized investigative strategy. We tested this procedure by studying MDA-MB-231 cells, which undergo apoptosis on treatment with resveratrol. Gene expression profiles were obtained using high-density. short-oligonucleotide, single-color microarray platforms: GeneChip (Affymetrix) and CodeLink (Amersham). Interplatform analyses were carried out on 8414 common transcripts represented on both platforms, as identified by LocusLink ID, representing 70.8% and 88.6% of annotated GeneChip and CodeLink features, respectively. We identified 105 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) on CodeLink and 42 DEGs on GeneChip. Among them, only 9 DEGs were commonly identified by both platforms. Multiple analyses (BLAST alignment of probes with target sequences. gene ontology, literature mining, and quantitative real-time PCR) permitted LIS to investigate the factors contributing to the generation of platform-dependent results in single-color microarray experiments. Ail effective approach to cross-platform comparison involves microarrays of similar technologies, samples prepared by identical methods, and a standardized battery of bioinformatic and statistical analyses. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?
    Järvinen, AK
    Hautaniemi, S
    Edgren, H
    Auvinen, P
    Saarela, J
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Monni, O
    GENOMICS, 2004, 83 (06) : 1164 - 1168
  • [2] Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms
    Tan, PK
    Downey, TJ
    Spitznagel, EL
    Xu, P
    Fu, D
    Dimitrov, DS
    Lempicki, RA
    Raaka, BM
    Cam, MC
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (19) : 5676 - 5684
  • [3] Can subtle changes in gene expression be consistently detected with different microarray platforms?
    Pedotti, Paola
    't Hoen, Peter A. C.
    Vreugdenhil, Erno
    Schenk, Geert J.
    Vossen, Rolf Ham
    Ariyurek, Yavuz
    de Hollander, Mattias
    Kuiper, Rowan
    van Ommen, Gertjan J. B.
    den Dunnen, Johan T.
    Boer, Judith M.
    de Menezes, Renee X.
    BMC GENOMICS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [4] Comparisons of gene expression data obtained using different microarray platforms.
    Phang, T
    Soriano, B
    Gaydos, J
    Bhave, SV
    Lapadat, R
    Zerbe, G
    Hoffman, PL
    Hunter, L
    Tabakoff, B
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (05) : 7A - 7A
  • [5] Can subtle changes in gene expression be consistently detected with different microarray platforms?
    Paola Pedotti
    Peter AC 't Hoen
    Erno Vreugdenhil
    Geert J Schenk
    Rolf HAM Vossen
    Yavuz Ariyurek
    Mattias de Hollander
    Rowan Kuiper
    Gertjan JB van Ommen
    Johan T den Dunnen
    Judith M Boer
    Renée X de Menezes
    BMC Genomics, 9
  • [6] A low density DNA microarray for comparing gene expression profiles in hematological malignancies.
    Alvarez, Patricia
    Saenz, Pilar
    Arleta, David
    Martiez, Antonio
    Pocovi, Miguel
    PilarGiraldo, Simon
    BLOOD, 2006, 108 (11) : 151B - 151B
  • [7] Data mining for gene expression profiles from DNA, microarray
    Cho, SB
    Won, HH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2003, 13 (06) : 593 - 608
  • [8] Different normalization strategies for microarray gene expression traits affect the heritability estimation
    Jun Ma
    Zhaohui S Qin
    BMC Proceedings, 1 (Suppl 1)
  • [9] From library screening to microarray technology: Strategies to determine gene expression profiles and to identify differentially regulated genes in plants
    Kuhn, E
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2001, 87 (02) : 139 - 155
  • [10] Significance test for comparing digital gene expression profiles: Partial likelihood application
    Varuzza, Leonardo
    de Braganca Pereira, Carlos Alberto
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2010, 1 (01): : 91 - 102