The use of the Community Earth System Model in human dimensions climate research and applications

被引:0
|
作者
Laidlaw, Emily K. [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, Brian C. [1 ,3 ]
Harp, Ryan D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Laidlaw Sci LLC, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Univ Denver, Josef Korbel Sch Int Studies, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CESM; earth system models; human dimensions; IMPACTS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earth system models (ESMs) are the primary tool used to understand and project changes to the climate system. ESM projections underpin analyses of human dimensions of the climate issue, yet little is known about how ESMs are used in human dimensions research. Such foundational information is necessary for future critical assessments of ESMs. We review applications of a leading ESM, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model (CESM), to human dimensions topics since 2004. We find that this research has grown substantially over this period, twice as fast as CESM research overall. Although many studies have primarily addressed long-term impacts on physical systems with societal relevance, applications to managed, societal, and ecological systems have grown quickly and now make up more than half of CESM human dimensions work. CESM applications focused nearly equally on global and regional analyses, most often using multimodel ensembles, although the use of single simulations remains prevalent. Downscaling and bias correction of output was infrequent and most common for regional studies. U.S.-based, university-affiliated authors primarily drove human dimensions work using CESM, with only 12% of authors based at NCAR. Our findings identify important questions that warrant further investigation, such as reasons for the infrequent use of downscaling and bias correction techniques; motivations to continue to use older model versions after newer model versions have been released; and model development needs for improved human dimensions applications. Additionally, our synthesis provides a baseline and framework that enables continued tracking of CESM and other ESMs. This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-Frequency North Atlantic Climate Variability in the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble
    Kim, Who M.
    Yeager, Stephen
    Chang, Ping
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (02) : 787 - 813
  • [32] The Community Climate System Model, version 2
    Kiehl, JT
    Gent, PR
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (19) : 3666 - 3682
  • [33] The Community Climate System Model Version 4
    Gent, Peter R.
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    Donner, Leo J.
    Holland, Marika M.
    Hunke, Elizabeth C.
    Jayne, Steve R.
    Lawrence, David M.
    Neale, Richard B.
    Rasch, Philip J.
    Vertenstein, Mariana
    Worley, Patrick H.
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    Zhang, Minghua
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (19) : 4973 - 4991
  • [34] Earth System Reanalysis in Support of Climate Model Improvements
    Stammer, Detlef
    Amrhein, Daniel E.
    Balmaseda, Magdalena Alonso
    Bertino, Laurent
    Bonavita, Massimo
    Buontempo, Carlo
    Caltabiano, Nico
    Counillon, Francois
    Fenty, Ian
    Ferrari, Raffaele
    Fujii, Yosuke
    Gaikwad, Shreyas Sunil
    Gentine, Pierre
    Gettelman, Andrew
    Gopalakrishnan, Ganesh
    Heimbach, Patrick
    Hersbach, Hans
    Hill, Chris
    Kobayashi, Shinya
    Koehl, Armin
    Kushner, Paul J.
    Mazloff, Matthew
    Nakamura, Hisashi
    Penny, Stephen G.
    Slivinski, Laura
    Tegtmeier, Susann
    Zanna, Laure
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (08) : E1399 - E1406
  • [35] NASA research strategy for earth system science: Climate component
    Asrar, G
    Kaye, JA
    Morel, P
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 82 (07) : 1309 - 1329
  • [36] Chemical Mechanisms and Their Applications in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Earth System Model
    Nielsen, J. Eric
    Pawson, Steven
    Molod, Andrea
    Auer, Benjamin
    da Silva, Arlindo M.
    Douglass, Anne R.
    Duncan, Bryan
    Liang, Qing
    Manyin, Michael
    Oman, Luke D.
    Putman, William
    Strahan, Susan E.
    Wargan, Krzysztof
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2017, 9 (08) : 3019 - 3044
  • [37] Global Climate Internal Variability in a 2000-year Control Simulation with Community Earth System Model(CESM)
    WANG Zhiyuan
    LI Yao
    LIU Bin
    LIU Jian
    Chinese Geographical Science , 2015, (03) : 263 - 273
  • [38] An improved ENSO simulation by representing chlorophyll-induced climate feedback in the NCAR Community Earth System Model
    Xianbiao Kang
    Rong-Hua Zhang
    Chuan Gao
    Jieshun Zhu
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [39] Global Climate Impacts of Fixing the Southern Ocean Shortwave Radiation Bias in the Community Earth System Model (CESM)
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    Wall, Casey
    Yettella, Vineel
    Medeiros, Brian
    Hannay, Cecile
    Caldwell, Peter
    Bitz, Cecilia
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (12) : 4617 - 4636
  • [40] A global dataset on subgrid land surface climate (2015-2100) from the Community Earth System Model
    Zhang, Keer
    Lee, Xuhui
    Schultz, Natalie M.
    Zhao, Lei
    He, Chunyang
    Huang, Qingxu
    Liu, Zhifeng
    Chu, Haoran
    Zhao, Jiayu
    GEOSCIENCE DATA JOURNAL, 2023, 10 (02): : 208 - 219